Domestic violence as terrorism: Can control orders succeed where DV orders have failed?

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Brendan Walker-Munro, Catherine Walker-Munro
{"title":"Domestic violence as terrorism: Can control orders succeed where DV orders have failed?","authors":"Brendan Walker-Munro, Catherine Walker-Munro","doi":"10.1177/1037969X231158879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have recently begun to explore the similarities between domestic violence and domestic terrorism. Both forms of offending rely on the use and threat of violence in conjunction with controlling behaviours to instil fear in their victims, and both forms of offending are predominantly committed by men. Yet despite these similarities, terrorism offences are treated as grave offences against the security of the nation-State, whilst domestic violence is not. The purpose of this paper therefore is to examine whether an amended control order framework – appropriately adapted to the unique criminological roots of domestic violence – might be a better mechanism for controlling these insidious crimes.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"120 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231158879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have recently begun to explore the similarities between domestic violence and domestic terrorism. Both forms of offending rely on the use and threat of violence in conjunction with controlling behaviours to instil fear in their victims, and both forms of offending are predominantly committed by men. Yet despite these similarities, terrorism offences are treated as grave offences against the security of the nation-State, whilst domestic violence is not. The purpose of this paper therefore is to examine whether an amended control order framework – appropriately adapted to the unique criminological roots of domestic violence – might be a better mechanism for controlling these insidious crimes.
作为恐怖主义的家庭暴力:控制令能否在家庭暴力令失败的地方成功?
学者们最近开始探索家庭暴力和家庭恐怖主义之间的相似之处。这两种形式的犯罪都依赖于暴力的使用和威胁,以及控制行为,以向受害者灌输恐惧,而这两种类型的犯罪主要由男性实施。然而,尽管有这些相似之处,恐怖主义罪行被视为严重危害民族国家安全的罪行,而家庭暴力则不然。因此,本文的目的是研究修改后的控制令框架——适当适应家庭暴力独特的犯罪学根源——是否是控制这些阴险犯罪的更好机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信