ACTIVE INGREDIENTS COMBINATIONS FOR PATHOGENS AND PESTS CONTROL ON EGGPLANT CROPS IN THE FIELD

M. Buzatu, G. Sbîrciog, S. Cristea, Costache Marcel
{"title":"ACTIVE INGREDIENTS COMBINATIONS FOR PATHOGENS AND PESTS CONTROL ON EGGPLANT CROPS IN THE FIELD","authors":"M. Buzatu, G. Sbîrciog, S. Cristea, Costache Marcel","doi":"10.51258/rjh.2020.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to identify combinations of active substances for the\ncomplex control of pathogens and pests on eggplant crops in the field. The\nexperiments were conducted between 2016 - 2017, in field conditions, using the\nvariety of eggplant Luiza and the following experimental variants: V 1 - Acrobat MZ 69\nWG 0.2% + Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%; V 2 - Acrobat MZ 69 WG 0.2% + Vertimec 1.8 EC\n0.1%; V 3 - Acrobat MZ 69 WG 0.2% + Laser 240 SC 0.05%; V 4 - Melody Compact 49\nWG 0.2% + Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%; V 5 - Melody Compact 49 WG 0.2% + Vertimec 1.8\nEC 0.1%; V 6 - Melody Compact 49 WG 0.2% + Laser 240 SC 0.05%; V 7 - Ortiva Top\n0.1% + Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%; V 8 - Ortiva Top 0.1% + Vertimec 1.8 EC 0.1%; V 9 -\nOrtiva Top 0.1% + Laser 240 SC 0.05%; V 10 - untreated control. The average efficacy\nof the treatment variants experienced in 2016 and 2017 varied between 83.2% (V4)\nand 85.0% (V8) depending on the combinations of products pathogens and pests\ncontrol. Analyzing the yields obtained (34.6 -44.0 t / ha in 2016 and 33.5 - 43.1 t / ha\nin 2017), compared to the untreated control variant (30.4 t / ha in 2016 and 31.1 t /\nha in 2017), it is found that the yield differences obtained in addition to the untreated\ncontrol variants were in all cases, very significant.","PeriodicalId":52654,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Horticulture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51258/rjh.2020.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to identify combinations of active substances for the complex control of pathogens and pests on eggplant crops in the field. The experiments were conducted between 2016 - 2017, in field conditions, using the variety of eggplant Luiza and the following experimental variants: V 1 - Acrobat MZ 69 WG 0.2% + Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%; V 2 - Acrobat MZ 69 WG 0.2% + Vertimec 1.8 EC 0.1%; V 3 - Acrobat MZ 69 WG 0.2% + Laser 240 SC 0.05%; V 4 - Melody Compact 49 WG 0.2% + Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%; V 5 - Melody Compact 49 WG 0.2% + Vertimec 1.8 EC 0.1%; V 6 - Melody Compact 49 WG 0.2% + Laser 240 SC 0.05%; V 7 - Ortiva Top 0.1% + Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%; V 8 - Ortiva Top 0.1% + Vertimec 1.8 EC 0.1%; V 9 - Ortiva Top 0.1% + Laser 240 SC 0.05%; V 10 - untreated control. The average efficacy of the treatment variants experienced in 2016 and 2017 varied between 83.2% (V4) and 85.0% (V8) depending on the combinations of products pathogens and pests control. Analyzing the yields obtained (34.6 -44.0 t / ha in 2016 and 33.5 - 43.1 t / ha in 2017), compared to the untreated control variant (30.4 t / ha in 2016 and 31.1 t / ha in 2017), it is found that the yield differences obtained in addition to the untreated control variants were in all cases, very significant.
茄子田间病虫害防治的有效成分组合
本研究旨在确定用于茄子作物田间病原体和害虫综合防治的活性物质组合。试验于2016年至2017年在田间条件下进行,使用茄子品种Luiza和以下实验变体:V1-Acrobat MZ 69WG 0.2%+Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%;V2-Acrobat MZ 69 WG 0.2%+Vertimec 1.8 EC0.1%;V3-Acrobat MZ 69 WG 0.2%+激光240 SC 0.05%;V4-旋律紧凑型49WG 0.2%+Mospilan 20 SG 0.04%;V 5-旋律紧凑49 WG 0.2%+Vertimec 1.8EC 0.1%;V6-旋律紧凑49 WG 0.2%+激光240 SC 0.05%;V 7-Ortiva Top0.1%+Mospilan 20 SG0.04%;V 8-Ortiva Top 0.1%+Vertimec 1.8 EC 0.1%;V9-Ortiva Top 0.1%+Laser 240 SC 0.05%;V10-未经处理的对照。2016年和2017年经历的治疗变体的平均有效性在83.2%(V4)和85.0%(V8)之间变化,这取决于产品病原体和杵控制的组合。分析所获得的产量(2016年为34.6-44.0吨/公顷,2017年为33.5-43.1吨/公顷),与未经处理的对照变体(2016年30.4吨/公顷和2017年31.1吨/公顷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信