Biochar Application and Soil Transfer in Tree Restoration: A Meta-Analysis and Field Experiment

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Edith Juno, I. Ibáñez
{"title":"Biochar Application and Soil Transfer in Tree Restoration: A Meta-Analysis and Field Experiment","authors":"Edith Juno, I. Ibáñez","doi":"10.3368/er.39.3.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harsh conditions hinder the establishment of trees in restoration of forests. Management options to increase survival such as watering or shading may be costly or infeasible. However, low-cost techniques like soil amendment with biochar (which enhances growth environment) and soil transfers (which introduces beneficial microbes) may increase establishment success. To assess the potential effects of biochar and forest soil transfers on woody plants performance we followed a two-pronged approach. We conducted a meta-analysis on the use of biochar on woody plants in various restoration contexts. We also carried out a field experiment where tree seedlings of Quercus rubra were transplanted in three restoration settings. Seedlings were planted under four treatments: soil inoculation and biochar (SB), only biochar (BC), only soil inoculation (SI), and control (C). We then monitored seedlings growth and survival. Results from the meta-analysis suggest positive effects of biochar on woody plant biomass, with an overall effect size of 0.03 ± 0.03 (mean ± SD) overall. However, effects varied widely among the genera analyzed and were negative for Quercus (-0.04 ± 0.002). In our field experiment, although we did not find significant differences among treatments, highest survival probability resulted under SI (mean ± SD, 0.11 ± 0.03) and lowest under C (0.04 ± 0.02). There was no effect of treatment on seedling biomass. Results from our two analyses indicate that the use of either, or both, soil amendment techniques may not be effective in all systems, therefore, these should be tailored to suit the focal species and ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":11492,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Restoration","volume":"39 1","pages":"158 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.39.3.158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Harsh conditions hinder the establishment of trees in restoration of forests. Management options to increase survival such as watering or shading may be costly or infeasible. However, low-cost techniques like soil amendment with biochar (which enhances growth environment) and soil transfers (which introduces beneficial microbes) may increase establishment success. To assess the potential effects of biochar and forest soil transfers on woody plants performance we followed a two-pronged approach. We conducted a meta-analysis on the use of biochar on woody plants in various restoration contexts. We also carried out a field experiment where tree seedlings of Quercus rubra were transplanted in three restoration settings. Seedlings were planted under four treatments: soil inoculation and biochar (SB), only biochar (BC), only soil inoculation (SI), and control (C). We then monitored seedlings growth and survival. Results from the meta-analysis suggest positive effects of biochar on woody plant biomass, with an overall effect size of 0.03 ± 0.03 (mean ± SD) overall. However, effects varied widely among the genera analyzed and were negative for Quercus (-0.04 ± 0.002). In our field experiment, although we did not find significant differences among treatments, highest survival probability resulted under SI (mean ± SD, 0.11 ± 0.03) and lowest under C (0.04 ± 0.02). There was no effect of treatment on seedling biomass. Results from our two analyses indicate that the use of either, or both, soil amendment techniques may not be effective in all systems, therefore, these should be tailored to suit the focal species and ecosystem.
生物炭在树木恢复中的应用与土壤迁移:Meta分析与田间试验
恶劣的条件阻碍了在恢复森林中植树造林。增加存活率的管理选择,如浇水或遮荫,可能成本高昂或不可行。然而,低成本的技术,如用生物炭改良土壤(改善生长环境)和土壤转移(引入有益微生物),可能会提高建立的成功率。为了评估生物炭和森林土壤转移对木本植物性能的潜在影响,我们采取了双管齐下的方法。我们对生物炭在各种修复环境中对木本植物的使用进行了荟萃分析。我们还进行了一项实地实验,在三个恢复环境中移植了红栎的幼苗。幼苗在四个处理下种植:土壤接种和生物炭(SB)、仅生物炭(BC)、仅土壤接种(SI)和对照(C)。然后我们监测幼苗的生长和存活。荟萃分析结果表明,生物炭对木本植物生物量有积极影响,总体影响大小为0.03±0.03(平均值±SD)。然而,所分析的属之间的影响差异很大,对Quercus的影响为负(-0.04±0.002)。在我们的田间试验中,尽管我们没有发现处理之间的显著差异,但在SI下的存活概率最高(平均值±SD,0.11±0.03),在C下的存活率最低(0.04±0.02)。处理对幼苗生物量没有影响。我们两次分析的结果表明,土壤改良技术中的一种或两种都可能在所有系统中都无效,因此,这些技术应该适合重点物种和生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Restoration
Ecological Restoration Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Ecological Restoration is a forum for people advancing the science and practice of restoration ecology. It features the technical and biological aspects of restoring landscapes, as well as collaborations between restorationists and the design professions, land-use policy, the role of education, and more. This quarterly publication includes peer-reviewed science articles, perspectives and notes, book reviews, abstracts of restoration ecology progress published elsewhere, and announcements of scientific and professional meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信