COVID-19 cases treated with classical homeopathy: a retrospective analysis of International Academy of Classical Homeopathy database

S. Mahesh, P. Hoffmann, Cristiane Kajimura, G. Vithoulkas
{"title":"COVID-19 cases treated with classical homeopathy: a retrospective analysis of International Academy of Classical Homeopathy database","authors":"S. Mahesh, P. Hoffmann, Cristiane Kajimura, G. Vithoulkas","doi":"10.29392/001c.77376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to global health. Classical homeopathy may have a role to play in alleviating this burden. The objective of this study was to curate data on the treatment effect of classical homeopathy for COVID-19 in a real-world scenario to guide future scientific investigations. Classical homeopaths from the International Academy of Classical Homeopathy (IACH) were asked to provide details on cases they treated by filling out a standardized questionnaire. COVID-19 cases were defined according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria as suspected/probable/confirmed cases, with intervention provided being either stand-alone classical homoeopathy or combined with conventional therapy for COVID-19. Cases were followed up with main outcomes being ‘improved’, ‘not improved’ or ‘progressed’ post-treatment. Details of the homeopathic remedies used and main symptoms at the presentation were gathered. Factors associated with main outcomes were investigated with correlational and regression analyses. 367 patients (male 166, female 201) met eligibility criteria (mean age 42.75 years). The mean follow-up period was 6.5 (standard deviation, SD=5.3) days. 255 were confirmed COVID-19 cases, with 61 probable and 51 suspected cases, respectively. The most used remedy was Arsenicum album. Over 73% of COVID-19 patients (and about 79% of severe cases) improved under classical homeopathic treatment. The number of remedies required per individual was negatively correlated to improvement (P< 0.01). Fever, the most common symptom at presentation (74.4%), was associated with an increased likelihood of improvement (P<0.01). Improvement was negatively associated with advanced age, but not associated with sex (P<0.01). This study suggests that classical homeopathy was associated with improvement in COVID-19, including severe cases. Despite limitations from study design and data sources, our findings should prompt further studies on the role of classical homeopathy in the management of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.77376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to global health. Classical homeopathy may have a role to play in alleviating this burden. The objective of this study was to curate data on the treatment effect of classical homeopathy for COVID-19 in a real-world scenario to guide future scientific investigations. Classical homeopaths from the International Academy of Classical Homeopathy (IACH) were asked to provide details on cases they treated by filling out a standardized questionnaire. COVID-19 cases were defined according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria as suspected/probable/confirmed cases, with intervention provided being either stand-alone classical homoeopathy or combined with conventional therapy for COVID-19. Cases were followed up with main outcomes being ‘improved’, ‘not improved’ or ‘progressed’ post-treatment. Details of the homeopathic remedies used and main symptoms at the presentation were gathered. Factors associated with main outcomes were investigated with correlational and regression analyses. 367 patients (male 166, female 201) met eligibility criteria (mean age 42.75 years). The mean follow-up period was 6.5 (standard deviation, SD=5.3) days. 255 were confirmed COVID-19 cases, with 61 probable and 51 suspected cases, respectively. The most used remedy was Arsenicum album. Over 73% of COVID-19 patients (and about 79% of severe cases) improved under classical homeopathic treatment. The number of remedies required per individual was negatively correlated to improvement (P< 0.01). Fever, the most common symptom at presentation (74.4%), was associated with an increased likelihood of improvement (P<0.01). Improvement was negatively associated with advanced age, but not associated with sex (P<0.01). This study suggests that classical homeopathy was associated with improvement in COVID-19, including severe cases. Despite limitations from study design and data sources, our findings should prompt further studies on the role of classical homeopathy in the management of COVID-19.
经典顺势疗法治疗COVID-19病例:国际经典顺势疗法学会数据库回顾性分析
新冠肺炎大流行对全球卫生构成了前所未有的挑战。传统顺势疗法可能在减轻这种负担方面发挥作用。本研究的目的是在现实世界中收集新冠肺炎经典顺势疗法治疗效果的数据,以指导未来的科学研究。来自国际古典顺势疗法学会(IACH)的古典顺势疗法者被要求通过填写标准化问卷来提供他们治疗的病例的详细信息。根据世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)的标准,新冠肺炎病例被定义为疑似/可能/确诊病例,提供的干预要么是独立的经典顺势疗法,要么与新冠肺炎的常规疗法相结合。对病例进行随访,主要结果为治疗后“改善”、“未改善”或“进展”。详细的顺势疗法药物使用和主要症状在介绍收集。通过相关分析和回归分析对与主要结果相关的因素进行了调查。367名患者(男166名,女201名)符合资格标准(平均年龄42.75岁)。平均随访时间为6.5天(标准差,SD=5.3)。新冠肺炎确诊病例255例,疑似和疑似病例分别为61例和51例。最常用的治疗方法是砷相册。超过73%的新冠肺炎患者(约79%的重症病例)在经典顺势疗法治疗下病情好转。每个人所需的治疗次数与病情好转呈负相关(P<0.01)。发烧是最常见的症状(74.4%),与病情好转的可能性增加有关(P<0.01),病情好转与高龄呈负相关,但与性别无关(P<0.01)。本研究表明,经典顺势疗法与新冠肺炎(包括重症)的改善有关。尽管研究设计和数据来源存在局限性,但我们的研究结果应促使对经典顺势疗法在新冠肺炎治疗中的作用进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信