“Pagan Politics in the 21st Century: ‘Peace and Love’ or ‘Blood and Soil’?”

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Pomegranate Pub Date : 2018-01-23 DOI:10.1558/POME.35632
Michael F. Strmiska
{"title":"“Pagan Politics in the 21st Century: ‘Peace and Love’ or ‘Blood and Soil’?”","authors":"Michael F. Strmiska","doi":"10.1558/POME.35632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay begins by reviewing definitions and categories of modern Paganism (also variously termed contemporary or neo-Paganism) that the author first proposed in the 2005 book Modern Paganism in World Culture and then proceeds to discuss parallels with certain political trends in Europe and America today. Particular attention will be paid to how the rising tide of pro-nativist, anti-immigrant, and anti-Muslim sentiment in contemporary European and American politics mirrors certain views and values espoused by the more ethnically oriented forms of Paganism, even though this seeming convergence of interests between Pagans and rightists at the political level is undercut at the religious level by the right wing's firm adherence to Christianity and rejection of religious diversity. The essay proceeds to examine how competing nineteenth century visions of ethnic-centered nationalism and universal humanism are replicated today in the more ethnic and traditional types of Paganism versus those that are more eclectic and universalistic in their outlook. Pagan responses to the events of August 1-12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia form the final topic.","PeriodicalId":41407,"journal":{"name":"Pomegranate","volume":"20 1","pages":"5-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pomegranate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/POME.35632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This essay begins by reviewing definitions and categories of modern Paganism (also variously termed contemporary or neo-Paganism) that the author first proposed in the 2005 book Modern Paganism in World Culture and then proceeds to discuss parallels with certain political trends in Europe and America today. Particular attention will be paid to how the rising tide of pro-nativist, anti-immigrant, and anti-Muslim sentiment in contemporary European and American politics mirrors certain views and values espoused by the more ethnically oriented forms of Paganism, even though this seeming convergence of interests between Pagans and rightists at the political level is undercut at the religious level by the right wing's firm adherence to Christianity and rejection of religious diversity. The essay proceeds to examine how competing nineteenth century visions of ethnic-centered nationalism and universal humanism are replicated today in the more ethnic and traditional types of Paganism versus those that are more eclectic and universalistic in their outlook. Pagan responses to the events of August 1-12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia form the final topic.
“21世纪的异教政治:‘和平与爱’还是‘血与土’?”
本文首先回顾了作者在2005年出版的《世界文化中的现代异教》一书中首次提出的现代异教的定义和类别(也被称为当代异教或新异教),然后继续讨论与当今欧美某些政治趋势的相似之处。我们将特别关注当代欧美政治中不断高涨的亲本土主义、反移民和反穆斯林情绪是如何反映出更以种族为导向的异教形式所支持的某些观点和价值观的,尽管在政治层面上,异教徒和右翼之间的这种表面上的利益趋同在宗教层面上被右翼对基督教的坚定坚持和对宗教多样性的拒绝所削弱。本文继续考察了19世纪以种族为中心的民族主义和普遍人文主义的相互竞争的观点是如何在今天更种族和传统的异教类型中与那些在其观点上更折衷和普遍的异教类型中复制的。最后一个主题是异教徒对2017年8月1日至12日弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔事件的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pomegranate
Pomegranate RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信