The banality of education policy: Discipline as extensive evil in the neoliberal era

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Clarke, Charlotte Haines Lyon, Emma Walker, Linda Walz, Jordi Collet-Sabé, K. Pritchard
{"title":"The banality of education policy: Discipline as extensive evil in the neoliberal era","authors":"M. Clarke, Charlotte Haines Lyon, Emma Walker, Linda Walz, Jordi Collet-Sabé, K. Pritchard","doi":"10.1177/17577438211041468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is usually considered a force for good, associated with hope and optimism about better individual and social futures. Yet a case can be made that education and education policy in recent decades, far from being a force for good, has had nefarious effects at multiple levels. This can be seen in the growing alienation of significant numbers of teachers and students in disparate global contexts and in the growth of authoritarian models of schooling, involving ‘zero-tolerance’, ‘no excuses’ disciplinary approaches, that have undermined notions of the common school as a public good. Against this background, and drawing on philosophical literature and our own empirical research, this study interrogates the practice in schools in England of placing students in ‘isolation’. In considering this practice as an instance of banal education policy, our study makes obvious reference to Hannah Arendt’s characterization of evil in her account of Adolf Eichmann’s trial. But it also draws on the work of moral philosophers, Elizabeth Minnich and Simona Forti, in relation to the distinction between intensive and extensive evil, in order to analyse the nature and effects of school discipline policies and practices such as isolation in the neoliberal era as a contemporary form of evil.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"187 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438211041468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Education is usually considered a force for good, associated with hope and optimism about better individual and social futures. Yet a case can be made that education and education policy in recent decades, far from being a force for good, has had nefarious effects at multiple levels. This can be seen in the growing alienation of significant numbers of teachers and students in disparate global contexts and in the growth of authoritarian models of schooling, involving ‘zero-tolerance’, ‘no excuses’ disciplinary approaches, that have undermined notions of the common school as a public good. Against this background, and drawing on philosophical literature and our own empirical research, this study interrogates the practice in schools in England of placing students in ‘isolation’. In considering this practice as an instance of banal education policy, our study makes obvious reference to Hannah Arendt’s characterization of evil in her account of Adolf Eichmann’s trial. But it also draws on the work of moral philosophers, Elizabeth Minnich and Simona Forti, in relation to the distinction between intensive and extensive evil, in order to analyse the nature and effects of school discipline policies and practices such as isolation in the neoliberal era as a contemporary form of evil.
教育政策的平庸:在新自由主义时代,纪律是广泛的邪恶
教育通常被认为是一种向善的力量,与对更好的个人和社会未来的希望和乐观联系在一起。然而,可以证明,近几十年来的教育和教育政策非但不是一股向善的力量,反而在多个层面产生了邪恶的影响。这可以从大量教师和学生在不同的全球环境中日益疏远,以及专制教育模式的发展中看出,这种模式涉及“零容忍”、“无借口”的纪律方法,破坏了普通学校作为公共产品的观念。在这种背景下,本研究借鉴哲学文献和我们自己的实证研究,对英国学校将学生置于“孤立”状态的做法进行了质疑。在将这种做法视为平庸的教育政策的一个例子时,我们的研究明显参考了汉娜·阿伦特在描述阿道夫·艾希曼的审判时对邪恶的描述。但它也借鉴了道德哲学家Elizabeth Minnich和Simona Forti在区分密集型和广泛型邪恶方面的工作,以分析新自由主义时代学校纪律政策和做法的性质和影响,例如作为当代邪恶形式的孤立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信