Artistic Immortality as an Objet Petit a: The Subject of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan”

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Sajed Hosseini, Payam Babaie
{"title":"Artistic Immortality as an Objet Petit a: The Subject of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan”","authors":"Sajed Hosseini, Payam Babaie","doi":"10.5782/2223-2621.2022.25.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a psychoanalytical reading of Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan” having an eye on Žižek’s theory of the subject. “Kubla Khan” contains a host of components providing an illustration of Coleridge’s psychological status. In such a case, Žižekian approach to psychoanalysis could provide a suitable paradigm for an analytical reading of the poem. The works of Žižek conducted disputatious re-articulations of the subject/object, the displacement of an objet petit a (object of desire) with object-cause of desire, and parallax. Žižek, like Hegel, accentuates the one-to-one relationship of the subject and the object while introducing parallax and the ticklish subject, which are later followed by tickling object. It is thus possible to illustrate the psychoanalytical status of Coleridge in the course of writing “Kubla Khan.” The poem pictures a path to immortality while it is in search to immortalize its poet too. In this study, it is demonstrated how Coleridge followed his objet petit a, which is ‘artistic immortality,’ in the lines of “Kubla Khan.”","PeriodicalId":41415,"journal":{"name":"Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2022.25.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a psychoanalytical reading of Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan” having an eye on Žižek’s theory of the subject. “Kubla Khan” contains a host of components providing an illustration of Coleridge’s psychological status. In such a case, Žižekian approach to psychoanalysis could provide a suitable paradigm for an analytical reading of the poem. The works of Žižek conducted disputatious re-articulations of the subject/object, the displacement of an objet petit a (object of desire) with object-cause of desire, and parallax. Žižek, like Hegel, accentuates the one-to-one relationship of the subject and the object while introducing parallax and the ticklish subject, which are later followed by tickling object. It is thus possible to illustrate the psychoanalytical status of Coleridge in the course of writing “Kubla Khan.” The poem pictures a path to immortality while it is in search to immortalize its poet too. In this study, it is demonstrated how Coleridge followed his objet petit a, which is ‘artistic immortality,’ in the lines of “Kubla Khan.”
作为小物件的艺术不朽——论柯勒律治的《忽必烈汗》
本研究对柯勒律治的《忽必烈》进行了心理分析解读,并着眼于日泽克的主题理论。《库布拉·可汗》包含了一系列的组成部分,为柯勒律治的心理状态提供了例证。在这种情况下,日基的精神分析方法可以为诗歌的分析阅读提供一个合适的范式。日耶克的作品对主体/客体、小客体(欲望的客体)与欲望的客体原因的位移以及视差进行了有争议的重新阐述。日耶克和黑格尔一样,强调了主体和客体的一对一关系,同时引入了视差和挠痒痒的主体,之后是挠痒痒对象。因此,可以说明柯勒律治在创作《忽必烈》过程中的精神分析地位。这首诗描绘了一条通往不朽的道路,同时也在寻求使诗人不朽。在这项研究中,我们展示了柯勒律治是如何遵循他的小物件的,即“艺术不朽”,就像“忽必烈”一样
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信