Ana Andruchow-Colombo, I. Escapa, L. Aagesen, K. Matsunaga
{"title":"In search of lost time: tracing the fossil diversity of Podocarpaceae through the ages","authors":"Ana Andruchow-Colombo, I. Escapa, L. Aagesen, K. Matsunaga","doi":"10.1093/botlinnean/boad027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Podocarpaceae are a morphologically diverse conifer family that have a cryptic fossil record reported since the Permian. We reviewed the fossil record of Podocarpaceae, tested the affinities of its oldest records using phylogenetic analyses, compiled macrofossil occurrence records, and investigated the diversity, distribution, and morphology of Podocarpaceae through time. We found that Permian, Triassic, and some Jurassic fossils referred to Podocarpaceae should not be placed in the family. Our total-evidence phylogenetic analyses, which sampled all major conifer lineages, recovered the Triassic Rissikia and the Jurassic Nothodacrium as stem-group conifers and the Jurassic Mataia as part of the Araucariales stem group. We further discuss the phylogenetic position of the Mesozoic enigmatic conifers Pararaucaria (Cheirolepidiaceae) and Telemachus (Voltziales), which were recovered most frequently in the conifer stem group. We conclude that the earliest reliable Podocarpaceae occurrences are from the Jurassic of both hemispheres and have scale-like leaves. Most extant genera appear in the fossil record between the Late Cretaceous and the Early Cenozoic. Many extant leaf morphologies appear in the Early Cretaceous, coeval with angiosperm diversification, consistent with the hypothesis that expanded leaves in Podocarpaceae are adaptive responses for light harvesting in angiosperm-dominated environments today.","PeriodicalId":9178,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boad027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Podocarpaceae are a morphologically diverse conifer family that have a cryptic fossil record reported since the Permian. We reviewed the fossil record of Podocarpaceae, tested the affinities of its oldest records using phylogenetic analyses, compiled macrofossil occurrence records, and investigated the diversity, distribution, and morphology of Podocarpaceae through time. We found that Permian, Triassic, and some Jurassic fossils referred to Podocarpaceae should not be placed in the family. Our total-evidence phylogenetic analyses, which sampled all major conifer lineages, recovered the Triassic Rissikia and the Jurassic Nothodacrium as stem-group conifers and the Jurassic Mataia as part of the Araucariales stem group. We further discuss the phylogenetic position of the Mesozoic enigmatic conifers Pararaucaria (Cheirolepidiaceae) and Telemachus (Voltziales), which were recovered most frequently in the conifer stem group. We conclude that the earliest reliable Podocarpaceae occurrences are from the Jurassic of both hemispheres and have scale-like leaves. Most extant genera appear in the fossil record between the Late Cretaceous and the Early Cenozoic. Many extant leaf morphologies appear in the Early Cretaceous, coeval with angiosperm diversification, consistent with the hypothesis that expanded leaves in Podocarpaceae are adaptive responses for light harvesting in angiosperm-dominated environments today.
期刊介绍:
The Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society publishes original papers on systematic and evolutionary botany and comparative studies of both living and fossil plants. Review papers are also welcomed which integrate fields such as cytology, morphogenesis, palynology and phytochemistry into a taxonomic framework. The Journal will only publish new taxa in exceptional circumstances or as part of larger monographic or phylogenetic revisions.