Returns on library investment: seeking causative relationship between the library investment and the institutional research output

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Shivendra Singh, R. Pandita, Kiran Baidwan
{"title":"Returns on library investment: seeking causative relationship between the library investment and the institutional research output","authors":"Shivendra Singh, R. Pandita, Kiran Baidwan","doi":"10.1108/cc-03-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to seek the causative relationship between the library budget and research output with the ranking of 20 leading medial institutes in India. More so, the study also attempts to find out whether the libraries associated with academic and research institutes in general and medical institutes in particular have turned redundant or irrelevant, or have become more relevant in the changing times by embracing technology in its every new form.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study is based on the secondary data retrieved from the official website of the Ministry of Education, Government of India and research output against each institution under study has been retrieved from Scopus. The study is limited to Indian medical institutions that participated in the 2019 National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), conducted by the Ministry of Education, India each year. The findings of the study can be generalized to all the medical institutions of the country.\n\n\nFindings\nOn average, INR 160.90m were spent by each medical institute on the procurement of library resources at an average of INR 0.104m on procurement of resources against each individual published research article. Of the total research articles published by medical institutes under study, 26.39% of research articles were published by researchers from AIIMS, New Delhi, alone.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFinancial aid or funding is very vital for the survival, sustenance and excellence of research institutions, and this funding becomes more important when the investigation is aimed toward the furtherance of medical advances. Any medical advancement is hell-bent to influence the overall welfare and betterment of society at large, whereby the benefit of any investment made in medical science is bound to be reaped by one and all alike.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn India, a good number of studies have been undertaken on the NIRF data to dive deeper to assess the role and importance of libraries in the overall ranking of institutions like universities, management institutes, engineering and technology institutes, but no major study has been so far conducted covering leading medical institutes in India. The study is the original and first of its kind undertaken in India.\n","PeriodicalId":41029,"journal":{"name":"Collection and Curation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection and Curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-03-2022-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to seek the causative relationship between the library budget and research output with the ranking of 20 leading medial institutes in India. More so, the study also attempts to find out whether the libraries associated with academic and research institutes in general and medical institutes in particular have turned redundant or irrelevant, or have become more relevant in the changing times by embracing technology in its every new form. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the secondary data retrieved from the official website of the Ministry of Education, Government of India and research output against each institution under study has been retrieved from Scopus. The study is limited to Indian medical institutions that participated in the 2019 National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), conducted by the Ministry of Education, India each year. The findings of the study can be generalized to all the medical institutions of the country. Findings On average, INR 160.90m were spent by each medical institute on the procurement of library resources at an average of INR 0.104m on procurement of resources against each individual published research article. Of the total research articles published by medical institutes under study, 26.39% of research articles were published by researchers from AIIMS, New Delhi, alone. Research limitations/implications Financial aid or funding is very vital for the survival, sustenance and excellence of research institutions, and this funding becomes more important when the investigation is aimed toward the furtherance of medical advances. Any medical advancement is hell-bent to influence the overall welfare and betterment of society at large, whereby the benefit of any investment made in medical science is bound to be reaped by one and all alike. Originality/value In India, a good number of studies have been undertaken on the NIRF data to dive deeper to assess the role and importance of libraries in the overall ranking of institutions like universities, management institutes, engineering and technology institutes, but no major study has been so far conducted covering leading medical institutes in India. The study is the original and first of its kind undertaken in India.
图书馆投资回报:寻找图书馆投资与机构科研产出的因果关系
目的本研究旨在通过对印度20所顶尖医学院的排名,寻求图书馆预算与研究产出之间的因果关系。更重要的是,这项研究还试图找出与学术和研究机构,特别是医学机构相关的图书馆是否已经变得多余或无关紧要,或者通过将技术融入每一种新形式,在不断变化的时代变得更加重要。设计/方法/方法该研究基于从印度政府教育部官方网站检索到的二次数据,并从Scopus检索到每个研究机构的研究成果。该研究仅限于参与印度教育部每年进行的2019年国家机构排名框架(NIRF)的印度医疗机构。这项研究的结果可以推广到全国所有的医疗机构。发现平均而言,每个医学机构在图书馆资源采购上花费了1.609亿卢比,而在每篇发表的研究文章的资源采购上平均花费了0.104亿卢比。在所研究的医学机构发表的全部研究文章中,仅新德里AIIMS的研究人员就发表了26.39%的研究文章。研究局限性/影响财政援助或资金对研究机构的生存、维持和卓越至关重要,当调查旨在促进医学进步时,这笔资金变得更加重要。任何医学进步都会影响整个社会的整体福利和改善,因此,对医学科学的任何投资都必然会惠及所有人。原创性/价值在印度,已经对NIRF数据进行了大量研究,以更深入地评估图书馆在大学、管理学院、工程和技术学院等机构的总体排名中的作用和重要性,但到目前为止,还没有对印度领先的医疗机构进行重大研究。这项研究是首次在印度进行此类研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collection and Curation
Collection and Curation INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信