Biocides Susceptibility of Clinically Isolated Escherichia coli in Presence and Without Organic Material

Q4 Medicine
Hamidreza Lotfi, T. Khalilzadeh, Maryam Damchi, Maryam Hassan
{"title":"Biocides Susceptibility of Clinically Isolated Escherichia coli in Presence and Without Organic Material","authors":"Hamidreza Lotfi, T. Khalilzadeh, Maryam Damchi, Maryam Hassan","doi":"10.30699/ijmm.16.5.447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Hospital-acquired infections are considered a major health concern worldwide because of the increasing morbidity and mortality rate. Hence, selecting the most efficient disinfectants in a clinic is crucial. This study evaluated the antibacterial efficacy of seven mostly used disinfectants against clinically isolated Escherichia coli . Materials and Methods: For this purpose, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of Aniosyme DD1 0.5%, Steranios 2%, Aniospray 29 and Surfanios 0.5% at Hazrat Valiasr hospital and PROSEPT ® Floor 0.75%, PROSEPT ® Instru 0.05% and PROSEPT ® Med used at Ayatollah Mousavi hospital were determined both in the presence and absence of bovine serum albumin (BSA) using microbroth dilution assay. Results: The results indicate that PROSEPT ® Med had the lowest MIC and MBC values, followed by Aniospray 29 and PROSEPT ® Instro, and the presence of BSA reduced antibacterial activities of disinfectants. Conclusion: The disinfectants applied at Ayatollah Mousavi hospital generally had higher antibacterial activities. Due to the importance of nosocomial pathogens at healthcare centers, selecting the most potent, fast-acting, and efficient disinfectants to prevent hospital-acquired infections is essential.","PeriodicalId":14580,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijmm.16.5.447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Aim: Hospital-acquired infections are considered a major health concern worldwide because of the increasing morbidity and mortality rate. Hence, selecting the most efficient disinfectants in a clinic is crucial. This study evaluated the antibacterial efficacy of seven mostly used disinfectants against clinically isolated Escherichia coli . Materials and Methods: For this purpose, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of Aniosyme DD1 0.5%, Steranios 2%, Aniospray 29 and Surfanios 0.5% at Hazrat Valiasr hospital and PROSEPT ® Floor 0.75%, PROSEPT ® Instru 0.05% and PROSEPT ® Med used at Ayatollah Mousavi hospital were determined both in the presence and absence of bovine serum albumin (BSA) using microbroth dilution assay. Results: The results indicate that PROSEPT ® Med had the lowest MIC and MBC values, followed by Aniospray 29 and PROSEPT ® Instro, and the presence of BSA reduced antibacterial activities of disinfectants. Conclusion: The disinfectants applied at Ayatollah Mousavi hospital generally had higher antibacterial activities. Due to the importance of nosocomial pathogens at healthcare centers, selecting the most potent, fast-acting, and efficient disinfectants to prevent hospital-acquired infections is essential.
临床分离大肠杆菌在存在和不存在有机物质的情况下对杀菌剂的敏感性
背景和目的:由于发病率和死亡率不断上升,医院获得性感染被认为是世界范围内一个主要的健康问题。因此,在诊所中选择最有效的消毒剂至关重要。本研究评估了七种常用消毒剂对临床分离的大肠杆菌的抗菌效果。材料和方法:为此,在Hazrat Valiasr医院和PROSEPT®Floor 0.75%的Aniosyme DD1 0.5%、Steranios 2%、Aniospray 29和Surfanios 0.5%的最低抑制浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC),在存在和不存在牛血清白蛋白(BSA)的情况下,使用微罗斯稀释法测定Ayatollah Mousavi医院使用的0.05%PROSEPT®Instru和PROSEPT™Med。结果:结果表明,PROSEPT®Med的MIC和MBC值最低,其次是Aniosprey 29和PROSEPT™Instro,BSA的存在降低了消毒剂的抗菌活性。结论:阿亚图拉·穆萨维医院使用的消毒剂一般具有较高的抗菌活性。由于医院病原体在医疗保健中心的重要性,选择最有效、快速有效的消毒剂来预防医院获得性感染至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信