TORT VICTIM’S ABILITY TO PROFIT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF INSOLVENT TORTFEASOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE

Yasser Mandela, I. K. D. P. Yoga
{"title":"TORT VICTIM’S ABILITY TO PROFIT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF INSOLVENT TORTFEASOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE","authors":"Yasser Mandela, I. K. D. P. Yoga","doi":"10.26623/jic.v5i1.2216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes and examines whether the tort victim can profit from the proceeds of the tortfeasor’s liability insurance. This article aims to reflect on which approach, either in common or civil law, provides more access for the tort victim to profits from the proceeds of insolvent tortfeasor’s liability insurance policy. The method used in this research is comparative research. The result of this research showed that the status of insurance proceeds becomes debatable because the tort victim (as the claimant) will have no better rights than any other unsecured creditors during insolvency proceedings. This is regardless of the fact that the tortfeasor already got a fund, albeit indirectly through the insurer, to compensate the tort victim’s losses. In relation to this issue, the United Kingdom has adopted the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 which gives right for tort victim to directly claim for compensation against tortfeasor’s liability insurer in the event of tortfeasor’s insolvency. Meanwhile, the Indonesian legal system provides no clear legal protection to the tort victim. Thus, in the event of insolvency, the tort victim cannot obtain compensation from the insurer, but only from tortfeasor’s bankruptcy estate as part of creditors’ debts. Furthermore, as an unsecured creditor, the tort victim will obtain the debtor’s bankruptcy estate after all secured creditors have received their payment.","PeriodicalId":31921,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ius Constituendum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ius Constituendum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes and examines whether the tort victim can profit from the proceeds of the tortfeasor’s liability insurance. This article aims to reflect on which approach, either in common or civil law, provides more access for the tort victim to profits from the proceeds of insolvent tortfeasor’s liability insurance policy. The method used in this research is comparative research. The result of this research showed that the status of insurance proceeds becomes debatable because the tort victim (as the claimant) will have no better rights than any other unsecured creditors during insolvency proceedings. This is regardless of the fact that the tortfeasor already got a fund, albeit indirectly through the insurer, to compensate the tort victim’s losses. In relation to this issue, the United Kingdom has adopted the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 which gives right for tort victim to directly claim for compensation against tortfeasor’s liability insurer in the event of tortfeasor’s insolvency. Meanwhile, the Indonesian legal system provides no clear legal protection to the tort victim. Thus, in the event of insolvency, the tort victim cannot obtain compensation from the insurer, but only from tortfeasor’s bankruptcy estate as part of creditors’ debts. Furthermore, as an unsecured creditor, the tort victim will obtain the debtor’s bankruptcy estate after all secured creditors have received their payment.
侵权受害人从破产侵权人责任保险中获利的能力
本文描述并考察了侵权行为人是否可以从侵权人责任保险的收益中获利。本文旨在反思,无论是在普通法还是民法中,哪种方法都为侵权行为受害者提供了更多的机会,使其能够从破产侵权人的责任保险单中获得利润。本研究采用比较研究的方法。这项研究的结果表明,保险收益的地位是有争议的,因为在破产程序中,侵权行为受害者(作为索赔人)没有比任何其他无担保债权人更好的权利。不管侵权人已经获得了一笔资金,尽管是通过保险公司间接获得的,以补偿侵权受害者的损失。关于这一问题,联合王国通过了《2010年第三方(针对保险人的权利)法》,该法赋予侵权行为受害者在侵权行为人破产的情况下直接向侵权行为人的责任保险人索赔的权利。同时,印尼法律体系没有为侵权行为受害者提供明确的法律保护。因此,在破产的情况下,侵权行为受害者不能从保险公司获得赔偿,只能从侵权人的破产财产中获得赔偿,作为债权人债务的一部分。此外,作为无担保债权人,侵权行为受害人将在所有有担保债权人收到付款后获得债务人的破产财产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信