Alveolar air leak and paraseptal emphysema in severe COVID-19 disease

A. Najafi, F. Fallahian, A. Ahmadi, K. Bakhtavar
{"title":"Alveolar air leak and paraseptal emphysema in severe COVID-19 disease","authors":"A. Najafi, F. Fallahian, A. Ahmadi, K. Bakhtavar","doi":"10.53097/jmv.10034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Corona virus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spread in the world as a great medical crisis. Its pathophysiology, manifestations, complications, and management are not completely defined, yet. In this study frequency of alveolar air leak in critically ill COVID-19 subjects is explored. Methods A total of 820 critically ill COVID-19 subjects who admitted with respiratory insufficiency to ICUs of Sina University Hospital from March 2020 to June 2021 were included. All their chest x ray (CXR) and Computed tomography (CT) of chest were reviewed. All alveolar air leak episodes (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, subcutaneous emphysema) suspected films reviewed by attending intensivist and radiologist. Results Of the 820 ill COVID-19 subjects in ICUs, 492(60%) were male, and 328 (40%) were female. The Mean age of 820 subjects was 60.84 + 16.82. 584 (71.22%) of subjects were non-intubated, and 236 (28.78%) were intubated. Alveolar air leak occurred in 98 (11.95%) of subjects. Alveolar air leak episodes include pneumothorax in 26 (3.17%), subcutaneous emphysema in 72 (8.78%), pneumomediastinum in 9 (1.10%), and pneumopericardium in 1 (0.12%) of subjects. The mean age in non-intubated subjects was 59.65 + 16.84, and for intubated subjects was 63 + 16.42. There was a significant difference in age between the groups who get intubated, versus not intubated P 0.001. Of the 584 non-intubated subjects, 31 (5.31%) had subcutaneous emphysema, of the 236 intubated subjects, 41 (17.37%) had subcutaneous emphysema. Difference between groups was statistically significant, P <0.001. When we compared intubated and non-intubated patients in case of total numbers of alveolar air leak episodes, the difference was statistically significant P <0.001. Conclusion According to this study, intubation was implemented more in older patients. Also, invasive ventilation was significantly associated with subcutaneous emphysema and total number of alveolar air leak episodes. In every patient with exaggeration of hypoxia, dyspnea or chest pain, pneumothorax should be kept in mind as a differential diagnosis. Keywords: COVID-19; Respiratory failure; Alveolar air leak; Paraseptal emphysema","PeriodicalId":73813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53097/jmv.10034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Corona virus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spread in the world as a great medical crisis. Its pathophysiology, manifestations, complications, and management are not completely defined, yet. In this study frequency of alveolar air leak in critically ill COVID-19 subjects is explored. Methods A total of 820 critically ill COVID-19 subjects who admitted with respiratory insufficiency to ICUs of Sina University Hospital from March 2020 to June 2021 were included. All their chest x ray (CXR) and Computed tomography (CT) of chest were reviewed. All alveolar air leak episodes (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, subcutaneous emphysema) suspected films reviewed by attending intensivist and radiologist. Results Of the 820 ill COVID-19 subjects in ICUs, 492(60%) were male, and 328 (40%) were female. The Mean age of 820 subjects was 60.84 + 16.82. 584 (71.22%) of subjects were non-intubated, and 236 (28.78%) were intubated. Alveolar air leak occurred in 98 (11.95%) of subjects. Alveolar air leak episodes include pneumothorax in 26 (3.17%), subcutaneous emphysema in 72 (8.78%), pneumomediastinum in 9 (1.10%), and pneumopericardium in 1 (0.12%) of subjects. The mean age in non-intubated subjects was 59.65 + 16.84, and for intubated subjects was 63 + 16.42. There was a significant difference in age between the groups who get intubated, versus not intubated P 0.001. Of the 584 non-intubated subjects, 31 (5.31%) had subcutaneous emphysema, of the 236 intubated subjects, 41 (17.37%) had subcutaneous emphysema. Difference between groups was statistically significant, P <0.001. When we compared intubated and non-intubated patients in case of total numbers of alveolar air leak episodes, the difference was statistically significant P <0.001. Conclusion According to this study, intubation was implemented more in older patients. Also, invasive ventilation was significantly associated with subcutaneous emphysema and total number of alveolar air leak episodes. In every patient with exaggeration of hypoxia, dyspnea or chest pain, pneumothorax should be kept in mind as a differential diagnosis. Keywords: COVID-19; Respiratory failure; Alveolar air leak; Paraseptal emphysema
重症COVID-19患者肺泡漏气和膈旁肺气肿
2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行在世界范围内蔓延,成为一场巨大的医疗危机。其病理生理、表现、并发症和治疗尚未完全明确。本研究探讨重症COVID-19患者肺泡漏气频率。方法收集2020年3月至2021年6月新浪大学医院重症监护病房收治的新冠肺炎危重患者820例。回顾了所有患者的胸部x线片(CXR)和CT (CT)。所有肺泡漏气发作(气胸、纵隔气肿、心包气肿、皮下肺气肿)的可疑片均由主治医师和放射科医生复查。结果820例icu病例中,男性492例(60%),女性328例(40%)。820例受试者平均年龄60.84 + 16.82岁。未插管584例(71.22%),插管236例(28.78%)。98例(11.95%)发生肺泡漏气。肺泡漏气事件包括气胸26例(3.17%),皮下肺气肿72例(8.78%),纵隔气肿9例(1.10%),心包气肿1例(0.12%)。非插管组平均年龄59.65 + 16.84岁,插管组平均年龄63 + 16.42岁。插管组与未插管组在年龄上有显著差异(P < 0.001)。584例未插管患者中有31例(5.31%)发生皮下肺气肿,236例插管患者中有41例(17.37%)发生皮下肺气肿。组间差异有统计学意义,P <0.001。当我们比较插管和非插管患者肺泡漏气发作的总次数时,差异有统计学意义P <0.001。结论根据本研究,插管在老年患者中应用较多。此外,有创通气与皮下肺气肿和肺泡漏气发作次数显著相关。对于每一位有严重缺氧、呼吸困难或胸痛的患者,应将气胸作为鉴别诊断。关键词:COVID-19;呼吸衰竭;肺泡漏气;Paraseptal肺气肿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信