Investigation of the use of ISO 16251-1 for the obtaining of acoustic insulation on floating floor

IF 1.4 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Gerardo Braga Alves Nogueira Braga Neto, Gabriel Soares Quixaba, Jeferson de Oliveira Bezerra, Sérgio de Souza Custódio Filho, Gustavo da S. V. de Melo, A. L. Mesquita
{"title":"Investigation of the use of ISO 16251-1 for the obtaining of acoustic insulation on floating floor","authors":"Gerardo Braga Alves Nogueira Braga Neto, Gabriel Soares Quixaba, Jeferson de Oliveira Bezerra, Sérgio de Souza Custódio Filho, Gustavo da S. V. de Melo, A. L. Mesquita","doi":"10.1177/1351010X221092526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ISO 16251-1 standard describes an alternative method for the experimental obtaining of acoustic parameters reduction of the impact sound pressure level (ΔL) and weighted reduction of the impact sound pressure level (ΔLw) for soft floor coverings through vibration measurements on a small floor mock-up. The application of the methodology to floating floor systems is of great interest, since, compared to the conventional method (ISO 10140-3), it is less costly and would require smaller specimens. However, previous studies have revealed an influence of the modal behavior of the slab on the sound insulation in the frequency range, causing the ΔL curves to show abrupt oscillations (peaks and valleys), thus deviating from the reliable insulation values and decreasing their accuracy. This study proposes the use of ISO 16251-1 for the evaluation of floating floor systems investigating the main factors that influence the accuracy of laboratory tests and the performance of the devices, namely dynamic stiffness of the resilient layer, total loss factor, and dimensions in the floating slab area. The results of ΔL and ΔLw obtained according to ISO 16251-1 were compared to those of two analytical models and the conventional method for 17 samples of floating mortar screeds of 0.96 and 0.36 m2 areas, 10.8–340.6 MN m−3 dynamic stiffness, and 0.04–0.39 total loss factor. The 0.96 m2 samples showed less abrupt oscillations in the ΔL curves than those of 0.36 m2, and the oscillations recorded for resilient layers of above 68.4 MN m−3 stiffness were minimal when the larger floating slab was used.","PeriodicalId":51841,"journal":{"name":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","volume":"29 1","pages":"239 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X221092526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ISO 16251-1 standard describes an alternative method for the experimental obtaining of acoustic parameters reduction of the impact sound pressure level (ΔL) and weighted reduction of the impact sound pressure level (ΔLw) for soft floor coverings through vibration measurements on a small floor mock-up. The application of the methodology to floating floor systems is of great interest, since, compared to the conventional method (ISO 10140-3), it is less costly and would require smaller specimens. However, previous studies have revealed an influence of the modal behavior of the slab on the sound insulation in the frequency range, causing the ΔL curves to show abrupt oscillations (peaks and valleys), thus deviating from the reliable insulation values and decreasing their accuracy. This study proposes the use of ISO 16251-1 for the evaluation of floating floor systems investigating the main factors that influence the accuracy of laboratory tests and the performance of the devices, namely dynamic stiffness of the resilient layer, total loss factor, and dimensions in the floating slab area. The results of ΔL and ΔLw obtained according to ISO 16251-1 were compared to those of two analytical models and the conventional method for 17 samples of floating mortar screeds of 0.96 and 0.36 m2 areas, 10.8–340.6 MN m−3 dynamic stiffness, and 0.04–0.39 total loss factor. The 0.96 m2 samples showed less abrupt oscillations in the ΔL curves than those of 0.36 m2, and the oscillations recorded for resilient layers of above 68.4 MN m−3 stiffness were minimal when the larger floating slab was used.
ISO 16251-1标准在浮式地板隔声性能评定中的应用探讨
ISO 16251-1标准描述了一种替代方法,用于通过在小型地板模型上进行振动测量,实验获得软地板覆盖物冲击声压级(ΔL)的声学参数降低和冲击声压级的加权降低。由于与传统方法(ISO 10140-3)相比,该方法成本较低,并且需要较小的样本,因此将该方法应用于浮地板系统是非常令人感兴趣的。然而,先前的研究表明,在频率范围内,板的模态行为会对隔音产生影响,导致ΔL曲线出现突然振荡(波峰和波谷),从而偏离可靠的隔音值并降低其准确性。本研究建议使用ISO 16251-1对浮板系统进行评估,调查影响实验室测试准确性和设备性能的主要因素,即弹性层的动态刚度、总损失系数和浮板区域的尺寸。将根据ISO 16251-1获得的ΔL和ΔLw的结果与两个分析模型和传统方法对17个0.96和0.36的浮动砂浆找平层样品的结果进行了比较 m2面积,10.8–340.6 MN m−3动态刚度和0.04–0.39总损失系数。0.96 m2样品在ΔL曲线中的突然振荡比0.36的样品少 m2,以及记录的68.4以上弹性层的振荡 MN 当使用较大的浮动板时,m−3刚度最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BUILDING ACOUSTICS
BUILDING ACOUSTICS ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信