Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and Quantitative Ultrasound for Bone Screening: A Case Series

Matthew de Ruig, C. J. Watson
{"title":"Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and Quantitative Ultrasound for Bone Screening: A Case Series","authors":"Matthew de Ruig, C. J. Watson","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Background: This case series assessed the clinical utility of the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the distal radius to screen subjects for higher fracture risk. The current gold standard to diagnose osteoporosis is the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. QUS is a valid and less expensive procedure for measuring properties of bone that can be performed over several body sites, including the distal radius. Our hypothesis was that the addition of QUS, to current bone health screening using FRAX alone, would identify more postmenopausal women with higher fracture risk. Case Description: In this case series, 2 postmenopausal women were screened with the FRAX tool. In addition, the nondominant distal radius was screened with QUS and the results were compared with the results of the respective subject’s DXA scans. Outcomes: The QUS measurement results placed our subjects in the same fracture risk category as their DXA scan bone mineral density scores. Discussion: In this case series, we present 2 postmenopausal women who demonstrate low fracture risk as predicted by the FRAX alone. Subsequent QUS measures detected that one of the women was at higher risk for fracture. Follow-up DXA scan confirmed that the QUS, which also directly assesses bone quality, correctly stratified the patients into low and high fracture risk categories. In addition to FRAX, QUS may be an important low-cost screening tool for physical therapists to use, to increase early referral for medical management.","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000172","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Background: This case series assessed the clinical utility of the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the distal radius to screen subjects for higher fracture risk. The current gold standard to diagnose osteoporosis is the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. QUS is a valid and less expensive procedure for measuring properties of bone that can be performed over several body sites, including the distal radius. Our hypothesis was that the addition of QUS, to current bone health screening using FRAX alone, would identify more postmenopausal women with higher fracture risk. Case Description: In this case series, 2 postmenopausal women were screened with the FRAX tool. In addition, the nondominant distal radius was screened with QUS and the results were compared with the results of the respective subject’s DXA scans. Outcomes: The QUS measurement results placed our subjects in the same fracture risk category as their DXA scan bone mineral density scores. Discussion: In this case series, we present 2 postmenopausal women who demonstrate low fracture risk as predicted by the FRAX alone. Subsequent QUS measures detected that one of the women was at higher risk for fracture. Follow-up DXA scan confirmed that the QUS, which also directly assesses bone quality, correctly stratified the patients into low and high fracture risk categories. In addition to FRAX, QUS may be an important low-cost screening tool for physical therapists to use, to increase early referral for medical management.
骨折风险评估工具和骨筛查的定量超声:一个病例系列
引言/背景:本病例系列评估了骨折风险评估(FRAX)工具和桡骨远端定量超声(QUS)在筛查骨折风险较高受试者方面的临床实用性。目前诊断骨质疏松症的金标准是双能x射线吸收仪(DXA)扫描。QUS是一种有效且成本较低的测量骨骼特性的程序,可以在多个身体部位进行,包括桡骨远端。我们的假设是,在目前仅使用FRAX进行骨健康筛查的基础上,添加QUS,将发现更多绝经后女性骨折风险更高。病例描述:在该病例系列中,2名绝经后妇女使用FRAX工具进行筛查。此外,用QUS筛查非显性桡骨远端,并将结果与相应受试者的DXA扫描结果进行比较。结果:QUS测量结果将我们的受试者与他们的DXA扫描骨密度评分归入相同的骨折风险类别。讨论:在这个病例系列中,我们介绍了2名绝经后妇女,她们表现出单独FRAX预测的低骨折风险。随后的QUS测量发现,其中一名女性骨折的风险更高。随访DXA扫描证实,QUS也直接评估骨质量,正确地将患者分为低骨折风险和高骨折风险两类。除了FRAX,QUS可能是物理治疗师使用的一个重要的低成本筛查工具,以增加医疗管理的早期转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信