Promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in primary care: the Function First realist synthesis with co-design

R. Law, Joe Langley, Beth Hall, C. Burton, J. Hiscock, L. Williams, V. Morrison, A. Lemmey, Candida Lovell-Smith, J. Gallanders, J. Cooney, N. Williams
{"title":"Promoting physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in primary care: the Function First realist synthesis with co-design","authors":"R. Law, Joe Langley, Beth Hall, C. Burton, J. Hiscock, L. Williams, V. Morrison, A. Lemmey, Candida Lovell-Smith, J. Gallanders, J. Cooney, N. Williams","doi":"10.3310/hsdr09160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n As people age and accumulate long-term conditions, their physical activity and physical function declines, resulting in disability and loss of independence. Primary care is well placed to empower individuals and communities to reduce this decline; however, the best approach is uncertain.\n \n \n \n To develop a programme theory to explain the mechanisms through which interventions improve physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in different primary care contexts, and to co-design a prototype intervention.\n \n \n \n Systematic literature searches of relevant databases with forwards and backwards citation tracking, grey literature searches and further purposive searches were conducted. Qualitative data were collected through workshops and interviews.\n \n \n \n Realist evidence synthesis and co-design for primary care service innovation.\n \n \n \n Primary care in Wales and England.\n \n \n \n Stakeholders included people with long-term conditions, primary care professionals, people working in relevant community roles and researchers.\n \n \n \n The realist evidence synthesis combined evidence from varied sources of literature with the views, experiences and ideas of stakeholders. The resulting context, mechanism and outcome statements informed three co-design workshops and a knowledge mobilisation workshop for primary care service innovation.\n \n \n \n Five context, mechanism and outcome statements were developed. (1) Improving physical activity and function is not prioritised in primary care (context). If the practice team culture is aligned to the elements of physical literacy (mechanism), then physical activity promotion will become routine and embedded in usual care (outcome). (2) Physical activity promotion is inconsistent and unco-ordinated (context). If specific resources are allocated to physical activity promotion (in combination with a supportive practice culture) (mechanism), then this will improve opportunities to change behaviour (outcome). (3) People with long-term conditions have varying levels of physical function and physical activity, varying attitudes to physical activity and differing access to local resources that enable physical activity (context). If physical activity promotion is adapted to individual needs, preferences and local resources (mechanism), then this will facilitate a sustained improvement in physical activity (outcome). (4) Many primary care practice staff lack the knowledge and confidence to promote physical activity (context). If staff develop an improved sense of capability through education and training (mechanism), then they will increase their engagement with physical activity promotion (outcome). (5) If a programme is credible with patients and professionals (context), then trust and confidence in the programme will develop (mechanism) and more patients and professionals will engage with the programme (outcome). A prototype multicomponent intervention was developed. This consisted of resources to nurture a culture of physical literacy, materials to develop the role of a credible professional who can promote physical activity using a directory of local opportunities and resources to assist with individual behaviour change.\n \n \n \n Realist synthesis and co-design is about what works in which contexts, so these resources and practice implications will need to be modified for different primary care contexts.\n \n \n \n We developed a programme theory to explain how physical activity could be promoted in primary care in people with long-term conditions, which informed a prototype intervention.\n \n \n \n A future research programme could further develop the prototype multicomponent intervention and assess its acceptability in practice alongside existing schemes before it is tested in a feasibility study to inform a future randomised controlled trial.\n \n \n \n This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018103027.\n \n \n \n This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.\n","PeriodicalId":12880,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Delivery Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Delivery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr09160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As people age and accumulate long-term conditions, their physical activity and physical function declines, resulting in disability and loss of independence. Primary care is well placed to empower individuals and communities to reduce this decline; however, the best approach is uncertain. To develop a programme theory to explain the mechanisms through which interventions improve physical activity and physical function in people with long-term conditions in different primary care contexts, and to co-design a prototype intervention. Systematic literature searches of relevant databases with forwards and backwards citation tracking, grey literature searches and further purposive searches were conducted. Qualitative data were collected through workshops and interviews. Realist evidence synthesis and co-design for primary care service innovation. Primary care in Wales and England. Stakeholders included people with long-term conditions, primary care professionals, people working in relevant community roles and researchers. The realist evidence synthesis combined evidence from varied sources of literature with the views, experiences and ideas of stakeholders. The resulting context, mechanism and outcome statements informed three co-design workshops and a knowledge mobilisation workshop for primary care service innovation. Five context, mechanism and outcome statements were developed. (1) Improving physical activity and function is not prioritised in primary care (context). If the practice team culture is aligned to the elements of physical literacy (mechanism), then physical activity promotion will become routine and embedded in usual care (outcome). (2) Physical activity promotion is inconsistent and unco-ordinated (context). If specific resources are allocated to physical activity promotion (in combination with a supportive practice culture) (mechanism), then this will improve opportunities to change behaviour (outcome). (3) People with long-term conditions have varying levels of physical function and physical activity, varying attitudes to physical activity and differing access to local resources that enable physical activity (context). If physical activity promotion is adapted to individual needs, preferences and local resources (mechanism), then this will facilitate a sustained improvement in physical activity (outcome). (4) Many primary care practice staff lack the knowledge and confidence to promote physical activity (context). If staff develop an improved sense of capability through education and training (mechanism), then they will increase their engagement with physical activity promotion (outcome). (5) If a programme is credible with patients and professionals (context), then trust and confidence in the programme will develop (mechanism) and more patients and professionals will engage with the programme (outcome). A prototype multicomponent intervention was developed. This consisted of resources to nurture a culture of physical literacy, materials to develop the role of a credible professional who can promote physical activity using a directory of local opportunities and resources to assist with individual behaviour change. Realist synthesis and co-design is about what works in which contexts, so these resources and practice implications will need to be modified for different primary care contexts. We developed a programme theory to explain how physical activity could be promoted in primary care in people with long-term conditions, which informed a prototype intervention. A future research programme could further develop the prototype multicomponent intervention and assess its acceptability in practice alongside existing schemes before it is tested in a feasibility study to inform a future randomised controlled trial. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018103027. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
促进初级保健中长期患者的身体活动和身体功能:功能至上的现实主义综合与共同设计
随着人们年龄的增长和长期疾病的积累,他们的身体活动和身体功能下降,导致残疾和丧失独立性。初级保健能够使个人和社区有能力减少这种下降;然而,最好的方法是不确定的。发展一个方案理论来解释干预措施在不同初级保健环境下改善长期疾病患者身体活动和身体功能的机制,并共同设计一个原型干预措施。对相关数据库进行系统文献检索,采用引文前后跟踪、灰色文献检索和进一步的有目的检索。通过研讨会和访谈收集定性数据。初级保健服务创新的现实证据综合与协同设计。威尔士和英格兰的初级保健。利益相关者包括长期病患者、初级保健专业人员、从事相关社区工作的人员和研究人员。现实主义证据综合将各种文献来源的证据与利益相关者的观点、经验和想法结合起来。由此产生的背景、机制和成果说明为三个共同设计讲习班和一个初级保健服务创新知识动员讲习班提供了信息。制定了五项背景、机制和结果说明。(1)改善身体活动和功能不是初级保健的重点(背景)。如果实践团队文化与体育素养要素(机制)相一致,那么体育活动促进将成为常规并嵌入日常护理(结果)。(2)体育活动促进不一致、不协调(语境)。如果将特定资源分配给体育活动促进(与支持性实践文化相结合)(机制),那么这将改善改变行为(结果)的机会。(3)长期疾病患者的身体功能和身体活动水平各不相同,对身体活动的态度各不相同,能够进行身体活动的当地资源也各不相同(背景)。如果身体活动促进适应个人需求、偏好和当地资源(机制),那么这将促进身体活动的持续改善(结果)。(4)许多初级保健工作人员缺乏促进身体活动的知识和信心(背景)。如果员工通过教育和培训(机制)提高了能力意识,那么他们就会增加对体育活动促进(结果)的参与。(5)如果一个方案在患者和专业人员中是可信的(背景),那么对该方案的信任和信心将会发展(机制),更多的患者和专业人员将参与该方案(结果)。开发了一个多组分干预的原型。这包括培养体育素养文化的资源,培养可信专业人员角色的材料,这些专业人员可以利用当地机会和资源目录促进体育活动,以帮助个人行为改变。现实主义综合和共同设计是关于什么在什么情况下起作用,所以这些资源和实践影响需要针对不同的初级保健情况进行修改。我们开发了一个程序理论来解释如何在长期疾病患者的初级保健中促进身体活动,这为原型干预提供了信息。未来的研究项目可以进一步发展多成分干预的原型,并评估其在实践中的可接受性,以及现有的方案,然后在可行性研究中进行测试,为未来的随机对照试验提供信息。本研究注册号为PROSPERO CRD42018103027。该项目由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生服务和交付研究方案资助,将全文发表在《卫生服务和交付研究》上;第九卷,第16期请参阅NIHR期刊图书馆网站了解更多项目信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信