Incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations and group decision-making

Q3 Mathematics
N. Şimşek, M. Kirişci
{"title":"Incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations and group decision-making","authors":"N. Şimşek, M. Kirişci","doi":"10.1515/taa-2022-0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There may be cases where experts do not have in-depth knowledge of the problem to be solved in decision-making problems. In such cases, experts may fail to express their views on certain aspects of the problem, resulting in incomplete preferences, in which some preference values are not provided or are missing. In this article, we present a new model for group decision-making (GDM) methods in which experts’ preferences can be expressed as incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. This model is guided by the additive-consistency property and only uses the preference values the expert provides. An additive consistency definition characterized by a Fermatean fuzzy priority vector has been given. The additive consistency property is also used to measure the level of consistency of the information provided by the experts. The proposed additive consistency definition’s property is presented, as well as a model for obtaining missing judgments in incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. We present a method for adjusting the inconsistency for Fermatean fuzzy preference relations, a model for obtaining the priority vector, and a method for increasing the consensus degrees of Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. In addition, we present a GDM method in environments with incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. To show that our method outperforms existing GDM methods in incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations environments, we have provided an example and compared it with some methods. It has been seen that our proposed GDM method is beneficial for GDM in deficient Fermatean fuzzy preference relation environments and produces meaningful results for us.","PeriodicalId":30611,"journal":{"name":"Topological Algebra and its Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topological Algebra and its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/taa-2022-0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract There may be cases where experts do not have in-depth knowledge of the problem to be solved in decision-making problems. In such cases, experts may fail to express their views on certain aspects of the problem, resulting in incomplete preferences, in which some preference values are not provided or are missing. In this article, we present a new model for group decision-making (GDM) methods in which experts’ preferences can be expressed as incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. This model is guided by the additive-consistency property and only uses the preference values the expert provides. An additive consistency definition characterized by a Fermatean fuzzy priority vector has been given. The additive consistency property is also used to measure the level of consistency of the information provided by the experts. The proposed additive consistency definition’s property is presented, as well as a model for obtaining missing judgments in incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. We present a method for adjusting the inconsistency for Fermatean fuzzy preference relations, a model for obtaining the priority vector, and a method for increasing the consensus degrees of Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. In addition, we present a GDM method in environments with incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations. To show that our method outperforms existing GDM methods in incomplete Fermatean fuzzy preference relations environments, we have provided an example and compared it with some methods. It has been seen that our proposed GDM method is beneficial for GDM in deficient Fermatean fuzzy preference relation environments and produces meaningful results for us.
不完全Fermatean模糊偏好关系与群体决策
在决策问题中,可能存在专家对所要解决的问题没有深入了解的情况。在这种情况下,专家可能无法就问题的某些方面表达他们的意见,导致不完整的偏好,其中没有提供或缺少一些偏好值。本文提出了一种新的群体决策模型,其中专家的偏好可以表示为不完全模糊偏好关系。该模型以可加性一致性为指导,只使用专家提供的偏好值。给出了用fermatan模糊优先向量表征的加性一致性定义。加性一致性也被用来衡量专家提供的信息的一致性水平。给出了所提出的加性一致性定义的性质,并给出了不完全费尔马模糊偏好关系中缺失判断的获取模型。提出了一种调整模糊偏好关系不一致性的方法,一种获取优先向量的模型,以及一种提高模糊偏好关系一致性度的方法。此外,我们提出了一种不完全模糊偏好关系环境下的GDM方法。为了证明我们的方法在不完全模糊偏好关系环境下优于现有的GDM方法,我们给出了一个例子,并与一些方法进行了比较。结果表明,本文提出的GDM方法适用于缺乏模糊偏好关系环境下的GDM问题,并为我们提供了有意义的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topological Algebra and its Applications
Topological Algebra and its Applications Mathematics-Algebra and Number Theory
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信