The Cerebral Windkessel as a Dynamic Pulsation Absorber

M. Egnor
{"title":"The Cerebral Windkessel as a Dynamic Pulsation Absorber","authors":"M. Egnor","doi":"10.5048/bio-c.2019.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and cerebral arterial and venous blood flow is pulsatile [1-4]. Capillary blood flow is nearly smooth [5,6,7]. The pulsatility of the CSF closely resembles the pulsatility of the intracranial veins [8,9], both of which have some characteristics of an arterial pulse, including, under some circumstances, a dicrotic notch [10]. Many aspects of the pulsatility of intracranial blood and CSF are difficult to understand, particularly because the pulsatile flow occurs in a rigid cranium which places obvious constraints on pulsatile dynamics. How is it that capillary blood flow is smooth, whereas the blood flow in the intracranial arteries and veins—sometimes only millimeters away from the capillaries— is quite pulsatile [3]? Why does the pulsatility of the veins resemble the pulsatility of the CSF [9]? Why do the CSF and venous pressure pulse waveforms have some characteristics of an arterial pulse [10]? Why does the intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse normally precede the arterial blood pressure (ABP) pulse, but lag with intracranial hypertension [1,6,11-14] (fig 1)? I propose that a useful approach to understanding these counterintuitive aspects of intracranial pulsatility is to consider the dynamics of the cerebral windkessel as that of a designed system. Such a system manifests design principles that accomplish specified goals, which for the cerebral windkessel is the buffering of arterial pulsatility—an unwanted ‘vibration’—in cerebral blood flow, while at the same time maintaining optimal cerebral blood flow and minimizing energy dissipation. This approach to exploring intracranial pulsatility entails reverse engineering of the cerebral windkessel, in accordance with established engineering principles of vibration control. Abstract","PeriodicalId":89660,"journal":{"name":"BIO-complexity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIO-complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5048/bio-c.2019.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Nearly all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and cerebral arterial and venous blood flow is pulsatile [1-4]. Capillary blood flow is nearly smooth [5,6,7]. The pulsatility of the CSF closely resembles the pulsatility of the intracranial veins [8,9], both of which have some characteristics of an arterial pulse, including, under some circumstances, a dicrotic notch [10]. Many aspects of the pulsatility of intracranial blood and CSF are difficult to understand, particularly because the pulsatile flow occurs in a rigid cranium which places obvious constraints on pulsatile dynamics. How is it that capillary blood flow is smooth, whereas the blood flow in the intracranial arteries and veins—sometimes only millimeters away from the capillaries— is quite pulsatile [3]? Why does the pulsatility of the veins resemble the pulsatility of the CSF [9]? Why do the CSF and venous pressure pulse waveforms have some characteristics of an arterial pulse [10]? Why does the intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse normally precede the arterial blood pressure (ABP) pulse, but lag with intracranial hypertension [1,6,11-14] (fig 1)? I propose that a useful approach to understanding these counterintuitive aspects of intracranial pulsatility is to consider the dynamics of the cerebral windkessel as that of a designed system. Such a system manifests design principles that accomplish specified goals, which for the cerebral windkessel is the buffering of arterial pulsatility—an unwanted ‘vibration’—in cerebral blood flow, while at the same time maintaining optimal cerebral blood flow and minimizing energy dissipation. This approach to exploring intracranial pulsatility entails reverse engineering of the cerebral windkessel, in accordance with established engineering principles of vibration control. Abstract
脑风管作为动态脉冲吸收器
几乎所有的脑脊液(CSF)流量以及脑动脉和静脉血流都是脉动的[1-4]。毛细管血流几乎是平稳的[5,6,7]。CSF的搏动与颅内静脉的搏动非常相似[8,9],两者都具有动脉脉冲的一些特征,在某些情况下,包括重搏切迹[10]。颅内血液和脑脊液脉动的许多方面都很难理解,特别是因为脉动流发生在坚硬的颅骨中,这对脉动动力学产生了明显的限制。为什么毛细管血流是平稳的,而颅内动脉和静脉中的血流——有时距离毛细管只有几毫米——是脉动的[3]?为什么静脉的搏动与CSF的搏动相似[9]?为什么CSF和静脉压脉冲波形具有动脉脉冲的某些特征[10]?为什么颅内压(ICP)脉冲通常在动脉血压(ABP)脉冲之前,但在颅内高压时滞后[1,6,11-14](图1)?我提出,理解颅内搏动的这些违反直觉的方面的一个有用方法是将脑血管的动力学视为设计系统的动力学。这样的系统体现了实现特定目标的设计原则,对大脑来说,这是对大脑血流中动脉搏动(一种不必要的“振动”)的缓冲,同时保持最佳的大脑血流并最大限度地减少能量耗散。根据既定的振动控制工程原理,这种探索颅内搏动的方法需要对大脑风箱进行逆向工程。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信