Risk management practices and credit risk of the significantly supervised European banks

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
A. Qureshi, Eric Lamarque
{"title":"Risk management practices and credit risk of the significantly supervised European banks","authors":"A. Qureshi, Eric Lamarque","doi":"10.1108/jfrc-12-2021-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine the influence of risk management (RM) practices on the credit risk of significantly supervised European banks.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo avoid regulatory and reporting discrepancies, this paper samples banks that come under the direct supervision of the European Central Bank. Significantly supervised European Banks are selected for the five years from 2013 to 2017. The RM and governance data is manually drawn (from annual reports, registration documents, governance and RM reports), and financial data sets are also used (from Moody’s BankFocus and ORBIS).\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that strong risk control and supervision by a powerful chief risk officer (CRO) reduces banks’ credit risk. Banks with sufficiently powerful and independent CROs tend to manage their risks effectively, therefore reporting lower credit risk.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nEuropean Union introduced Capital Requirement Directive IV in 2013 and new guidelines on the banks' internal governance in 2017, which were to be implemented in 2018. Thus, this paper limited the sample to five years (from 2013 to 2017) to avoid inconsistencies in the results. Future studies can extend the research and compare banks' credit risk before and after the implementation of regulatory guidelines.\n\n\nPractical implications\nSince the global financial crisis, the regulatory environment has sufficiently changed. Hence, this study reveals that not all RM practices but a few important ones reduce credit risk.\n\n\nSocial implications\nEffective risk control and supervision at the bank level can lower credit risk, ultimately enhancing overall financial stability.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nMost existing studies focus on classic governance indicators to analyze banks’ credit risk; however, this paper considers risk governance indicators which include RM practices used by European banks. Moreover, existing studies in this line focus on the crisis period of 2007–2008. This paper considered the postfinancial crisis period, specifically after the implementation of the Capital Requirements Directive IV at the European level.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-12-2021-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the influence of risk management (RM) practices on the credit risk of significantly supervised European banks. Design/methodology/approach To avoid regulatory and reporting discrepancies, this paper samples banks that come under the direct supervision of the European Central Bank. Significantly supervised European Banks are selected for the five years from 2013 to 2017. The RM and governance data is manually drawn (from annual reports, registration documents, governance and RM reports), and financial data sets are also used (from Moody’s BankFocus and ORBIS). Findings The results indicate that strong risk control and supervision by a powerful chief risk officer (CRO) reduces banks’ credit risk. Banks with sufficiently powerful and independent CROs tend to manage their risks effectively, therefore reporting lower credit risk. Research limitations/implications European Union introduced Capital Requirement Directive IV in 2013 and new guidelines on the banks' internal governance in 2017, which were to be implemented in 2018. Thus, this paper limited the sample to five years (from 2013 to 2017) to avoid inconsistencies in the results. Future studies can extend the research and compare banks' credit risk before and after the implementation of regulatory guidelines. Practical implications Since the global financial crisis, the regulatory environment has sufficiently changed. Hence, this study reveals that not all RM practices but a few important ones reduce credit risk. Social implications Effective risk control and supervision at the bank level can lower credit risk, ultimately enhancing overall financial stability. Originality/value Most existing studies focus on classic governance indicators to analyze banks’ credit risk; however, this paper considers risk governance indicators which include RM practices used by European banks. Moreover, existing studies in this line focus on the crisis period of 2007–2008. This paper considered the postfinancial crisis period, specifically after the implementation of the Capital Requirements Directive IV at the European level.
受到严格监管的欧洲银行的风险管理实践和信贷风险
目的本文旨在考察风险管理(RM)实践对受严格监管的欧洲银行信用风险的影响。设计/方法/方法为了避免监管和报告的差异,本文对受欧洲央行直接监管的银行进行了抽样。2013年至2017年的五年中,选择了受到严格监管的欧洲银行。RM和治理数据是手动提取的(来自年度报告、注册文件、治理和RM报告),还使用了财务数据集(来自Moody's BankFocus和ORBIS)。结果表明,由强大的首席风险官(CRO)进行强有力的风险控制和监督可以降低银行的信用风险。拥有足够强大和独立的CRO的银行往往能够有效地管理其风险,因此报告的信贷风险较低。研究限制/含义欧盟于2013年推出了《资本要求指令IV》,并于2017年推出了关于银行内部治理的新指南,这些指南将于2018年实施。因此,本文将样本限制在五年内(从2013年到2017年),以避免结果不一致。未来的研究可以扩展研究范围,并比较监管指南实施前后银行的信贷风险。实际含义自全球金融危机以来,监管环境已经发生了充分的变化。因此,这项研究表明,并非所有的RM实践都能降低信贷风险,而是一些重要的实践。社会影响银行层面的有效风险控制和监管可以降低信贷风险,最终增强金融整体稳定。独创性/价值现有的研究大多侧重于经典的治理指标来分析银行的信贷风险;然而,本文考虑了风险治理指标,其中包括欧洲银行使用的RM实践。此外,这方面的现有研究集中在2007-2008年的危机时期。本文考虑了金融危机后时期,特别是在欧洲层面实施《资本要求指令IV》之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信