Deep learning methods for biotic and abiotic stresses detection and classification in fruits and vegetables: State of the art and perspectives

IF 8.2 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sèton Calmette Ariane Houetohossou , Vinasetan Ratheil Houndji , Castro Gbêmêmali Hounmenou , Rachidatou Sikirou , Romain Lucas Glele Kakaï
{"title":"Deep learning methods for biotic and abiotic stresses detection and classification in fruits and vegetables: State of the art and perspectives","authors":"Sèton Calmette Ariane Houetohossou ,&nbsp;Vinasetan Ratheil Houndji ,&nbsp;Castro Gbêmêmali Hounmenou ,&nbsp;Rachidatou Sikirou ,&nbsp;Romain Lucas Glele Kakaï","doi":"10.1016/j.aiia.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deep Learning (DL), a type of Machine Learning, has gained significant interest in many fields, including agriculture. This paper aims to shed light on deep learning techniques used in agriculture for abiotic and biotic stress detection in fruits and vegetables, their benefits, and the challenges faced by users. Scientific papers were collected from Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Springer, and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) using combinations of specific keywords such as:’Deep Learning’ OR’Artificial Intelligence’ in combination with fruit disease’, vegetable disease’, ‘fruit stress', OR ‘vegetable stress' following PRISMA guidelines. From the initial 818 papers identified using the keywords, 132 were reviewed after excluding books, reviews, and the irrelevant. The recovered scientific papers were from 2003 to 2022; 93 % addressed biotic stress on fruits and vegetables. The most common biotic stresses on species are fungal diseases (grey spots, brown spots, black spots, downy mildew, powdery mildew, and anthracnose). Few studies were interested in abiotic stresses (nutrient deficiency, water stress, light intensity, and heavy metal contamination). Deep Learning and Convolutional Neural Networks were the most used keywords, with GoogleNet (18.28%), ResNet50 (16.67%), and VGG16 (16.67%) as the most used architectures. Fifty-two percent of the data used to compile these models come from the fields, followed by data obtained online. Precision problems due to unbalanced classes and the small size of some databases were also analyzed. We provided the research gaps and some perspectives from the reviewed papers. Further research works are required for a deep understanding of the use of machine learning techniques in fruit and vegetable studies: collection of large datasets according to different scenarios on fruit and vegetable diseases, evaluation of the effect of climatic variability on the fruit and vegetable yield using AI methods and more abiotic stress studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52814,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 46-60"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589721723000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep Learning (DL), a type of Machine Learning, has gained significant interest in many fields, including agriculture. This paper aims to shed light on deep learning techniques used in agriculture for abiotic and biotic stress detection in fruits and vegetables, their benefits, and the challenges faced by users. Scientific papers were collected from Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Springer, and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) using combinations of specific keywords such as:’Deep Learning’ OR’Artificial Intelligence’ in combination with fruit disease’, vegetable disease’, ‘fruit stress', OR ‘vegetable stress' following PRISMA guidelines. From the initial 818 papers identified using the keywords, 132 were reviewed after excluding books, reviews, and the irrelevant. The recovered scientific papers were from 2003 to 2022; 93 % addressed biotic stress on fruits and vegetables. The most common biotic stresses on species are fungal diseases (grey spots, brown spots, black spots, downy mildew, powdery mildew, and anthracnose). Few studies were interested in abiotic stresses (nutrient deficiency, water stress, light intensity, and heavy metal contamination). Deep Learning and Convolutional Neural Networks were the most used keywords, with GoogleNet (18.28%), ResNet50 (16.67%), and VGG16 (16.67%) as the most used architectures. Fifty-two percent of the data used to compile these models come from the fields, followed by data obtained online. Precision problems due to unbalanced classes and the small size of some databases were also analyzed. We provided the research gaps and some perspectives from the reviewed papers. Further research works are required for a deep understanding of the use of machine learning techniques in fruit and vegetable studies: collection of large datasets according to different scenarios on fruit and vegetable diseases, evaluation of the effect of climatic variability on the fruit and vegetable yield using AI methods and more abiotic stress studies.

果蔬生物与非生物胁迫检测与分类的深度学习方法:现状与展望
深度学习(DL)是一种机器学习,在包括农业在内的许多领域都引起了人们的极大兴趣。本文旨在阐明农业中用于水果和蔬菜非生物和生物胁迫检测的深度学习技术、它们的好处以及用户面临的挑战。科学论文是从科学网、Scopus、谷歌学者、施普林格和开放获取期刊目录(DOAJ)收集的,使用特定关键词的组合,如:“深度学习”或“人工智能”与水果疾病、蔬菜疾病、水果应激或“蔬菜应激”,遵循PRISMA指南。在最初使用关键词识别的818篇论文中,132篇在排除书籍、评论和无关内容后进行了评论。回收的科学论文为2003年至2022年;93%的人解决了水果和蔬菜的生物压力问题。对物种最常见的生物胁迫是真菌病(灰点、褐色斑点、黑色斑点、霜霉菌、白粉菌和炭疽病)。很少有研究对非生物胁迫(营养缺乏、水分胁迫、光照强度和重金属污染)感兴趣。深度学习和卷积神经网络是最常用的关键词,GoogleNet(18.28%)、ResNet50(16.67%)和VGG16(16.67%。用于编译这些模型的52%的数据来自野外,其次是在线获得的数据。还分析了由于类不平衡和一些数据库的小规模而导致的精度问题。我们从综述的论文中提供了研究空白和一些观点。需要进一步的研究工作来深入理解机器学习技术在水果和蔬菜研究中的应用:根据水果和蔬菜疾病的不同场景收集大型数据集,使用人工智能方法评估气候变异对水果和蔬菜产量的影响,以及更多的非生物胁迫研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信