Résonnances oasiennes. Approches sensibles de l’urbain au Sahara [Resonances from the Oases. Sensitive approaches to the urban in the Sahara]

IF 0.8 3区 历史学 N/A ARCHITECTURE
N. Lafi
{"title":"Résonnances oasiennes. Approches sensibles de l’urbain au Sahara [Resonances from the Oases. Sensitive approaches to the urban in the Sahara]","authors":"N. Lafi","doi":"10.1080/02665433.2023.2202119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"land and its conversion into a dynamic and thriving new core for London. Importantly, landscape transformation is seen as the key to project justification. So, why the difference in tone as well as content? Part of the reason stems from narrative. The Olympics, and most things connected with them, are habitually enmeshed in powerful narratives, with proponents and critics of the Games trading diametrically opposed views legitimized by contrasting metanarratives of historical meaning and current worth. However, an additional factor in the case of London 2012 are the starting points taken for analysis. Judgments about legacy made when the starting point is 1980 might well be different than when analysis begins with the bid promises of the early twenty-first century. Relatively few academic researchers would have been personally familiar with the lower Lea Valley before the clearance and soil cleansing programme started; an element that perhaps underpins a current tendency to downplay the extent of the area’s blighted industrial past. By contrast, many of the planning practitioners had witnessed the profound dereliction that characterized the area in the late twentieth century and took it as part of their moral imperative for working to bring about change. The state of the landscape, the blocked watercourses, and the environmental contamination were essential parts of the rationale for the legacy that was to be created. Yet in many ways, the divergences in these accounts essentially reflect the state of the art. The historiography of London 2012 as well as its legacy remain at a formative stage, with many different voices supporting and contesting prevailing interpretations. Excellent in their own ways and offering consistent and substantiated viewpoints, State of the Legacy and Play the Game provide useful contributions towards improving our understanding of the urban legacy of this landmark sporting and cultural festival. As such, they are steps on the road towards formulating the other, more subtly textured tales that are yet to be told.","PeriodicalId":46569,"journal":{"name":"Planning Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2023.2202119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

land and its conversion into a dynamic and thriving new core for London. Importantly, landscape transformation is seen as the key to project justification. So, why the difference in tone as well as content? Part of the reason stems from narrative. The Olympics, and most things connected with them, are habitually enmeshed in powerful narratives, with proponents and critics of the Games trading diametrically opposed views legitimized by contrasting metanarratives of historical meaning and current worth. However, an additional factor in the case of London 2012 are the starting points taken for analysis. Judgments about legacy made when the starting point is 1980 might well be different than when analysis begins with the bid promises of the early twenty-first century. Relatively few academic researchers would have been personally familiar with the lower Lea Valley before the clearance and soil cleansing programme started; an element that perhaps underpins a current tendency to downplay the extent of the area’s blighted industrial past. By contrast, many of the planning practitioners had witnessed the profound dereliction that characterized the area in the late twentieth century and took it as part of their moral imperative for working to bring about change. The state of the landscape, the blocked watercourses, and the environmental contamination were essential parts of the rationale for the legacy that was to be created. Yet in many ways, the divergences in these accounts essentially reflect the state of the art. The historiography of London 2012 as well as its legacy remain at a formative stage, with many different voices supporting and contesting prevailing interpretations. Excellent in their own ways and offering consistent and substantiated viewpoints, State of the Legacy and Play the Game provide useful contributions towards improving our understanding of the urban legacy of this landmark sporting and cultural festival. As such, they are steps on the road towards formulating the other, more subtly textured tales that are yet to be told.
Résonnances绿洲。认可撒哈拉城市的敏感性[绿洲的共鸣。撒哈拉城市的敏感方法]
并将其转变为一个充满活力和繁荣的伦敦新核心。重要的是,景观改造被视为项目合理性的关键。那么,为什么语气和内容都有所不同呢?部分原因源于叙事。奥运会,以及与之相关的大多数事物,都习惯性地卷入了强有力的叙事之中,奥运会的支持者和批评者们交换着截然相反的观点,通过对比历史意义和当前价值的元叙事来合法化。然而,2012年伦敦奥运会的另一个因素是分析的起点。以1980年为起点对遗产的判断,很可能与以21世纪初的申办承诺为起点的分析有所不同。在清理和土壤净化计划开始之前,很少有学术研究人员个人熟悉利亚河谷下游;这一因素可能支持了当前淡化该地区衰落的工业历史程度的趋势。相比之下,许多规划从业人员目睹了20世纪后期该地区严重的遗弃现象,并将其视为努力实现变革的道德责任的一部分。景观状况、堵塞的水道和环境污染是要创造的遗产的基本原理。然而,在许多方面,这些说法的分歧本质上反映了技术的现状。2012年伦敦奥运会的历史编纂及其遗产仍处于形成阶段,有许多不同的声音支持和争论主流的解释。《遗产的状态》和《玩游戏》以各自的方式出色地提供了一致和确凿的观点,为提高我们对这个具有里程碑意义的体育和文化节日的城市遗产的理解做出了有益的贡献。就其本身而言,它们是在形成另一个尚未被讲述的更微妙的故事的道路上迈出的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Planning Perspectives is a peer-reviewed international journal of history, planning and the environment, publishing historical and prospective articles on many aspects of plan making and implementation. Subjects covered link the interest of those working in economic, social and political history, historical geography and historical sociology with those in the applied fields of public health, housing construction, architecture and town planning. The Journal has a substantial book review section, covering UK, North American and European literature.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信