Diagnostic Yield of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for the Evaluation of Chronic Cough in Patients with Normal Chest X-Ray

S. Zainab, Reid Ro Jay, Solis Roberto
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for the Evaluation of Chronic Cough in Patients with Normal Chest X-Ray","authors":"S. Zainab, Reid Ro Jay, Solis Roberto","doi":"10.23937/2378-3516/1410116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 30 million annual clinic visits are attributed to cough in the United States. Moreover, evaluation and management of persistent cough in pulmonary clinics account for roughly 40% of patient volume. The most common etiologies are: Upper airway cough syndrome (UACS), asthma, non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) all of which are treatable. However, despite avoidance of triggers and medical therapy, there remains an elusive diagnosis for some individuals with persistent cough. Further investigation warrants bronchoscopy, which is indicated for patients with persistent or unexplained cough. The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB) with Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) for chronic cough in patients with normal chest roentgenogram. FB records were reviewed in cohort for a period of 3 years. Only patients with normal chest roentgenograms who remained refractory to medical therapy were included in the study. Fifty-two (52) cases encompassing ages 20-90 were reviewed. In 42 cases, BAL was negative for any diagnostic cause. Eight (8) cases were significant for infectious processes, one (1) case diagnosed bronchiectasis, and 1 case was lost to follow-up. Statistical analysis between the total cases in each group was statistically significant p < 0.001. Thus, though FB with BAL is indicated in chronic cough of unknown etiology, its diagnostic yield is low.","PeriodicalId":91516,"journal":{"name":"International journal of respiratory and pulmonary medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of respiratory and pulmonary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3516/1410116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 30 million annual clinic visits are attributed to cough in the United States. Moreover, evaluation and management of persistent cough in pulmonary clinics account for roughly 40% of patient volume. The most common etiologies are: Upper airway cough syndrome (UACS), asthma, non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) all of which are treatable. However, despite avoidance of triggers and medical therapy, there remains an elusive diagnosis for some individuals with persistent cough. Further investigation warrants bronchoscopy, which is indicated for patients with persistent or unexplained cough. The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB) with Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) for chronic cough in patients with normal chest roentgenogram. FB records were reviewed in cohort for a period of 3 years. Only patients with normal chest roentgenograms who remained refractory to medical therapy were included in the study. Fifty-two (52) cases encompassing ages 20-90 were reviewed. In 42 cases, BAL was negative for any diagnostic cause. Eight (8) cases were significant for infectious processes, one (1) case diagnosed bronchiectasis, and 1 case was lost to follow-up. Statistical analysis between the total cases in each group was statistically significant p < 0.001. Thus, though FB with BAL is indicated in chronic cough of unknown etiology, its diagnostic yield is low.
纤维支气管镜对正常胸片患者慢性咳嗽的诊断价值
在美国,每年约有3000万人次的门诊就诊归因于咳嗽。此外,肺部诊所对持续咳嗽的评估和管理约占患者量的40%。最常见的病因是:上呼吸道咳嗽综合征(UACS)、哮喘、非哮喘性嗜酸性支气管炎(NAEB)和胃食管反流病(GERD),所有这些都是可以治疗的。然而,尽管避免了触发因素和药物治疗,但对于一些持续咳嗽的人来说,仍然有一个难以捉摸的诊断。进一步的调查需要支气管镜检查,这适用于持续或不明原因咳嗽的患者。本研究的目的是评估纤维支气管镜(FB)结合支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)对胸部X线片正常的慢性咳嗽患者的诊断率。FB记录在队列中进行了为期3年的回顾。只有胸部x线片正常但对药物治疗仍顽固的患者被纳入研究。对年龄在20-90岁之间的五十二(52)例病例进行了回顾性分析。在42例病例中,BAL对任何诊断原因均为阴性。8例感染过程显著,1例诊断为支气管扩张,1例失访。各组总病例之间的统计分析具有统计学意义p<0.001。因此,尽管FB和BAL用于病因不明的慢性咳嗽,但其诊断率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书