Evaluation of safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients monoinfected with hepatitis B virus based on real life data

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
F. Akyüz, B. Çavuş, Nihan Nizam, Suut Göktürk, B. Baran, H. Yazıcı, S. Evirgen, Ü. Akyüz, Tuba Öbekli, Ç. Karaca, K. Demir, F. Beşışık, S. Kaymakoğlu
{"title":"Evaluation of safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients monoinfected with hepatitis B virus based on real life data","authors":"F. Akyüz, B. Çavuş, Nihan Nizam, Suut Göktürk, B. Baran, H. Yazıcı, S. Evirgen, Ü. Akyüz, Tuba Öbekli, Ç. Karaca, K. Demir, F. Beşışık, S. Kaymakoğlu","doi":"10.5114/ceh.2022.114153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction There are limited data about the safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in chronic renal failure (CRF). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TDF in renal transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during long-term follow-up. Material and methods CHB patients undergoing hemodialysis (group 1), renal transplant recipients (group 2) and patients with normal renal function were included in the study. All patients were treated with TDF for at least 6 months. The groups were compared with regards to safety and efficacy. HBV-DNA levels were studied using a Cobas-TaqMan 96 system. Results A total of 217 patients with CHB (group 1: 8 patients, group 2: 9 patients, group 3: 200 patients) were enrolled in this study. The frequency of clinical adverse effects was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2compared with group 3 (37.5% vs. 11.1% vs. 0.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). However, no patients discontinued the drug due to the adverse effects. Serum creatinine levels were similar at baseline and at the end of follow-up in groups 1 and 2 (6.5 ±1.8 mg/dl and 6.9 ±1.5 mg/dl; 1.3 ±0.2 and 1.4 ±0.4 mg/dl, respectively, p < 0.05). HBV-DNA negativity rates were comparable at the 12th month and at the end of follow-up (50-83% for group 1, 60-67% for group 2 and 70-75% for group 3, respectively, p > 0.05). Conclusions Clinical adverse effects of TDF were more common in patients with CRF in comparison with patients without CRF. However, the occurrence of adverse effects did not necessitate discontinuation of the drug. TDF was safe and effective for this group of patients.","PeriodicalId":10281,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"8 1","pages":"7 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2022.114153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction There are limited data about the safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in chronic renal failure (CRF). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TDF in renal transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during long-term follow-up. Material and methods CHB patients undergoing hemodialysis (group 1), renal transplant recipients (group 2) and patients with normal renal function were included in the study. All patients were treated with TDF for at least 6 months. The groups were compared with regards to safety and efficacy. HBV-DNA levels were studied using a Cobas-TaqMan 96 system. Results A total of 217 patients with CHB (group 1: 8 patients, group 2: 9 patients, group 3: 200 patients) were enrolled in this study. The frequency of clinical adverse effects was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2compared with group 3 (37.5% vs. 11.1% vs. 0.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). However, no patients discontinued the drug due to the adverse effects. Serum creatinine levels were similar at baseline and at the end of follow-up in groups 1 and 2 (6.5 ±1.8 mg/dl and 6.9 ±1.5 mg/dl; 1.3 ±0.2 and 1.4 ±0.4 mg/dl, respectively, p < 0.05). HBV-DNA negativity rates were comparable at the 12th month and at the end of follow-up (50-83% for group 1, 60-67% for group 2 and 70-75% for group 3, respectively, p > 0.05). Conclusions Clinical adverse effects of TDF were more common in patients with CRF in comparison with patients without CRF. However, the occurrence of adverse effects did not necessitate discontinuation of the drug. TDF was safe and effective for this group of patients.
基于真实生活数据的替诺福韦二oproxil在血液透析和肾移植单感染乙肝病毒患者中的安全性和有效性评价
引言富马酸替诺福韦二酯(TDF)治疗慢性肾功能衰竭(CRF)的安全性数据有限。在本研究中,我们旨在评估TDF在长期随访期间对肾移植受者和慢性乙型肝炎血液透析患者的安全性和有效性。材料和方法将接受血液透析的慢性乙型肝炎患者(第1组)、肾移植受者(第2组)和肾功能正常的患者纳入研究。所有患者均接受TDF治疗至少6个月。比较两组的安全性和有效性。使用Cobas-TaqMan 96系统研究HBV-DNA水平。结果217例慢性乙型肝炎患者(第1组:8例,第2组:9例,第3组:200例)被纳入本研究。与第3组相比,第1组和第2组的临床不良反应发生率显著较高(分别为37.5%和11.1%和0.5%,p<0.001)。然而,没有患者因不良反应而停药。第1组和第2组的血清肌酸酐水平在基线和随访结束时相似(分别为6.5±1.8 mg/dl和6.9±1.5 mg/dl;1.3±0.2和1.4±0.4 mg/dl,p<0.05)。第12个月和随访结束的HBV-DNA阴性率相当(第1组为50-83%,第2组为60-67%,第3组为70-75%,p>0.05)与没有CRF的患者相比,TDF的作用在CRF患者中更常见。然而,不良反应的发生并不需要停药。TDF对这组患者是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hepatology – quarterly of the Polish Association for Study of Liver – is a scientific and educational, peer-reviewed journal publishing original and review papers describing clinical and basic investigations in the field of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信