The Nature of Space by Milton Santos (review)

IF 0.9 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
M.L.R. Silveira, Liz Mason-Deese
{"title":"The Nature of Space by Milton Santos (review)","authors":"M.L.R. Silveira, Liz Mason-Deese","doi":"10.1353/lag.2022.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several years after the publication of Por uma geografia nova (1978), in which Milton Santos carried out a rigorous critique of geography, defended the premises of a nascent critical geography and announced the continuation of an ambitious project of theoretical reflection on human space, the publication of A natureza do espaço (The Nature of Space) in 1996 crowned his extensive research, offering the most comprehensive and systematic elaboration of his theory of geographic space. Now translated into English, this work provides a fundamental framework for the global diffusion of this situated thought with a universal vocation. The important technical, social, political, and economic transformations of the last three decades of the twentieth century, the excessive fragmentation of science, and his dissatisfaction with a geography that was either too empirical or too adjectival, led Milton Santos to deepen his analysis of space as a matrix of social life and to formulate new methodological questions. In some sense, this book is a journey upstream of what could be expected from a theoretical text in geography, as the author starts from the real and not from an epistemological discussion. The important issue, he points out, is not to debate geography, but rather the being of space, its constitution, its ontology. Thus, he dedicates the first part of the book to those topics. Inherited structures, current processes, and tendencies are recognized based on categories extracted from the real that, at the same time, allow for elaborating and analyzing a discipline’s object. In that way, in dialogue with philosophers of technique, such as Simondon (1989) and Ellul (1977), Santos affirms that the being of contemporary space is technical and therefore technique is a constitutive category (Granger, 1993) that allows for empirizing time and space as historical phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":46531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Geography","volume":"21 1","pages":"201 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2022.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several years after the publication of Por uma geografia nova (1978), in which Milton Santos carried out a rigorous critique of geography, defended the premises of a nascent critical geography and announced the continuation of an ambitious project of theoretical reflection on human space, the publication of A natureza do espaço (The Nature of Space) in 1996 crowned his extensive research, offering the most comprehensive and systematic elaboration of his theory of geographic space. Now translated into English, this work provides a fundamental framework for the global diffusion of this situated thought with a universal vocation. The important technical, social, political, and economic transformations of the last three decades of the twentieth century, the excessive fragmentation of science, and his dissatisfaction with a geography that was either too empirical or too adjectival, led Milton Santos to deepen his analysis of space as a matrix of social life and to formulate new methodological questions. In some sense, this book is a journey upstream of what could be expected from a theoretical text in geography, as the author starts from the real and not from an epistemological discussion. The important issue, he points out, is not to debate geography, but rather the being of space, its constitution, its ontology. Thus, he dedicates the first part of the book to those topics. Inherited structures, current processes, and tendencies are recognized based on categories extracted from the real that, at the same time, allow for elaborating and analyzing a discipline’s object. In that way, in dialogue with philosophers of technique, such as Simondon (1989) and Ellul (1977), Santos affirms that the being of contemporary space is technical and therefore technique is a constitutive category (Granger, 1993) that allows for empirizing time and space as historical phenomenon.
米尔顿·桑托斯的《空间的本质》(综述)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.10%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信