Evaluation on Criterion Validity of Enterprise Health Promotion Index

Lee, Jinhwa, Ryoo Jang-Jin, Yu Young-Soo, and Lee Bokim
{"title":"Evaluation on Criterion Validity of Enterprise Health Promotion Index","authors":"Lee, Jinhwa, Ryoo Jang-Jin, Yu Young-Soo, and Lee Bokim","doi":"10.5807/KJOHN.2017.26.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the validity of the 'Enterprise Health Promotion Index', a tool for assessing health promotion activities of worksite developed by the Ministry of Employment and Labor and the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Methods: This is designed a methodological study that evaluates the validity of the Enterprise Health Promotion Index. For this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted for the workplace health professional and safety professional, and a total of 297 data were extracted as final data. We developed the informal health promotion needs and activity measurement tools. The correlation coefficient between the score of the enterprise health promotion index and the score of the informal health promotion tool was analyzed for the criterion validity evaluation. Results: The criterion validity of the Enterprise Health Promotion Index and activity index were supported by finding moderate (r=.597) and high (r=.783) correlation coefficient. However, the requirement index has low levels of criterion validity (r=.364). Conclusion: Based on these results, we suggest to improve the utility of the corporate health promotion index by developing user manual, active public relations, and providing briefing sessions.","PeriodicalId":76268,"journal":{"name":"Occupational health nursing","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5807/KJOHN.2017.26.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the validity of the 'Enterprise Health Promotion Index', a tool for assessing health promotion activities of worksite developed by the Ministry of Employment and Labor and the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Methods: This is designed a methodological study that evaluates the validity of the Enterprise Health Promotion Index. For this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted for the workplace health professional and safety professional, and a total of 297 data were extracted as final data. We developed the informal health promotion needs and activity measurement tools. The correlation coefficient between the score of the enterprise health promotion index and the score of the informal health promotion tool was analyzed for the criterion validity evaluation. Results: The criterion validity of the Enterprise Health Promotion Index and activity index were supported by finding moderate (r=.597) and high (r=.783) correlation coefficient. However, the requirement index has low levels of criterion validity (r=.364). Conclusion: Based on these results, we suggest to improve the utility of the corporate health promotion index by developing user manual, active public relations, and providing briefing sessions.
企业健康促进指数标准有效性评价
目的:本研究旨在评估“企业健康促进指数”的有效性,该指数是由雇佣劳动部和韩国职业安全卫生署开发的一种评估工地健康促进活动的工具。方法:本研究旨在对企业健康促进指数的有效性进行方法学评价。本研究对工作场所健康专业人员和安全专业人员进行了问卷调查,共提取297项数据作为最终数据。我们开发了非正式的健康促进需求和活动衡量工具。对企业健康促进指数得分与非正式健康促进工具得分的相关系数进行了标准有效性评价。结果:企业健康促进指数和活动指数的标准有效性得到了中等(r=.597)和高(r=.783)相关系数的支持。然而,需求指数的标准有效性水平较低(r=.364)。结论:基于这些结果,我们建议通过开发用户手册、积极的公共关系和提供简报会来提高企业健康促进指数的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信