Manual Drawing in Transformation: A Brief Assessment of "Design-by-Drawing" and Potentials of a Body Technique in Times of Digitalization

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gert Hasenhütl
{"title":"Manual Drawing in Transformation: A Brief Assessment of \"Design-by-Drawing\" and Potentials of a Body Technique in Times of Digitalization","authors":"Gert Hasenhütl","doi":"10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper analyzes the transformation of manual drawing in the context of design and art. The historical paradigm shift from \"unselfconscious form-making processes\" to \"design-by-drawing\" is closely associated with the current transformation of manual drawing into \"digital\" or \"spatial sketching.\" It is argued that design-by-drawing has changed our view of manual drawing as a body technique, for example, from hand–eye coordination more toward an aesthetic perspective by coupling certain forms of attention to this technique. Design-by-drawing is transforming manual drawing into diagramming, coding, or modeling within the paradigm of system design. It becomes obvious that the paradigm shift is not based on disruptive but on incremental innovations since the 1960s. An important focus is on the disparity between a deskilling of classical manual abilities and a reskilling of \"body techniques\" by the use of innovative man–machine interfaces. By reviewing the pros and cons of manual drawings from the fields of engineering design, graphic design, and art education, future prospects of the use of manual drawings are shown. Examining historical changes in manual drawing can help in understanding current transformations. The arguments presented can contribute to the development of a new framework for the use of this classic technique in design.","PeriodicalId":45866,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This paper analyzes the transformation of manual drawing in the context of design and art. The historical paradigm shift from "unselfconscious form-making processes" to "design-by-drawing" is closely associated with the current transformation of manual drawing into "digital" or "spatial sketching." It is argued that design-by-drawing has changed our view of manual drawing as a body technique, for example, from hand–eye coordination more toward an aesthetic perspective by coupling certain forms of attention to this technique. Design-by-drawing is transforming manual drawing into diagramming, coding, or modeling within the paradigm of system design. It becomes obvious that the paradigm shift is not based on disruptive but on incremental innovations since the 1960s. An important focus is on the disparity between a deskilling of classical manual abilities and a reskilling of "body techniques" by the use of innovative man–machine interfaces. By reviewing the pros and cons of manual drawings from the fields of engineering design, graphic design, and art education, future prospects of the use of manual drawings are shown. Examining historical changes in manual drawing can help in understanding current transformations. The arguments presented can contribute to the development of a new framework for the use of this classic technique in design.
转型中的手工绘画——浅谈数字化时代“以图设计”与人体技术的潜力
摘要:本文分析了手工绘画在设计与艺术语境下的转型。从“无意识的形式制作过程”到“绘图设计”的历史范式转变与当前手工绘图向“数字”或“空间素描”的转变密切相关。有人认为,绘图设计改变了我们对手工绘图作为一种身体技术的看法,例如,通过将某些形式的注意力与这种技术结合起来,从手眼协调更多地转向审美角度。绘图设计是将手工绘图转换为系统设计范例中的绘图、编码或建模。很明显,自上世纪60年代以来,这种范式转变不是基于破坏性创新,而是基于渐进式创新。一个重要的焦点是通过使用创新的人机界面来重新培训传统的手工技能和“身体技术”之间的差异。从工程设计、平面设计、美术教育三个方面对手工制图的优缺点进行了综述,并对手工制图的应用前景进行了展望。检查手工绘图中的历史变化可以帮助理解当前的变化。所提出的论点可以为在设计中使用这种经典技术的新框架的发展做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aesthetic Education (JAE) is a highly respected interdisciplinary journal that focuses on clarifying the issues of aesthetic education understood in its most extensive meaning. The journal thus welcomes articles on philosophical aesthetics and education, to problem areas in education critical to arts and humanities at all institutional levels; to an understanding of the aesthetic import of the new communications media and environmental aesthetics; and to an understanding of the aesthetic character of humanistic disciplines. The journal is a valuable resource not only to educators, but also to philosophers, art critics and art historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信