Journalism in Democracy: A Discourse Analysis of Twitter Posts on the Ferrerasgate Scandal

IF 2.6 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Itziar Reguero-Sanz, Pablo Berdón-Prieto, Jacobo Herrero-Izquierdo
{"title":"Journalism in Democracy: A Discourse Analysis of Twitter Posts on the Ferrerasgate Scandal","authors":"Itziar Reguero-Sanz, Pablo Berdón-Prieto, Jacobo Herrero-Izquierdo","doi":"10.17645/mac.v11i2.6314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research analyses the discourse on Twitter surrounding the “Ferrerasgate” scandal involving the Spanish journalist Antonio García Ferreras, director and host of the television show Al Rojo Vivo (La Sexta, Spanish TV channel). It examines the main object of criticism, the tone of the discourse, the argumentation made by users, as well as the existence of hate in their rhetoric. The tweets included in the study’s sample (N = 2,846), posted between 5 and 15 July 2022 and extracted on 16 July 2022, were examined in two complementary phases. The first entailed a quantitative content analysis of the messages and the second analysed whether hate speech was found in the sample as a whole. The Sketch Engine tool was used to determine whether “crypto hate speech” existed in the sample as a whole, and to whom it was targeted. The results reveal that “Ferrerasgate” sparked a debate that spilt over into journalism across the board, calling into question the media’s role in a democracy. The most prominent arguments were the condemnation of misinformation, lack of independence, and absence of professionalism in the journalism sector. It should be noted that most of the messages were destructive in tone; hate was found in the tweets analysed, although these did not represent a high percentage in relation to the total sample.","PeriodicalId":18348,"journal":{"name":"Media and Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research analyses the discourse on Twitter surrounding the “Ferrerasgate” scandal involving the Spanish journalist Antonio García Ferreras, director and host of the television show Al Rojo Vivo (La Sexta, Spanish TV channel). It examines the main object of criticism, the tone of the discourse, the argumentation made by users, as well as the existence of hate in their rhetoric. The tweets included in the study’s sample (N = 2,846), posted between 5 and 15 July 2022 and extracted on 16 July 2022, were examined in two complementary phases. The first entailed a quantitative content analysis of the messages and the second analysed whether hate speech was found in the sample as a whole. The Sketch Engine tool was used to determine whether “crypto hate speech” existed in the sample as a whole, and to whom it was targeted. The results reveal that “Ferrerasgate” sparked a debate that spilt over into journalism across the board, calling into question the media’s role in a democracy. The most prominent arguments were the condemnation of misinformation, lack of independence, and absence of professionalism in the journalism sector. It should be noted that most of the messages were destructive in tone; hate was found in the tweets analysed, although these did not represent a high percentage in relation to the total sample.
民主新闻:费雷斯盖特丑闻推特帖子的话语分析
这项研究分析了推特上围绕西班牙记者安东尼奥·加西亚·费雷拉斯(Antonio García Ferreras)的“费雷拉斯盖特”丑闻的讨论,费雷拉斯是电视节目Al Rojo Vivo(西班牙电视频道La Sexta)的导演和主持人。它考察了批评的主要对象、话语的语气、使用者的论证,以及他们的修辞中仇恨的存在。该研究样本中包含的推文(N=2846)于2022年7月5日至15日发布,并于2022年6月16日提取,分两个互补阶段进行了检查。第一个是对信息进行定量内容分析,第二个是分析整个样本中是否存在仇恨言论。草图引擎工具用于确定整个样本中是否存在“加密仇恨言论”,以及它的目标人群。结果显示,《费雷拉斯盖特》引发了一场辩论,并蔓延到了新闻界,对媒体在民主中的作用提出了质疑。最突出的论点是谴责新闻部门的错误信息、缺乏独立性和缺乏专业精神。应该指出的是,大多数信息的语气都是破坏性的;在分析的推文中发现了仇恨,尽管这些推文在总样本中所占比例并不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media and Communication
Media and Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) is an international open access journal dedicated to a wide variety of basic and applied research in communication and its related fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信