A case study review and reasonability assessment of the foreign employment income tax exemption threshold in section 10(1)(o)(ii) of the Income Tax Act

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Kgonthe Sebashe, Henriette Lynette Erasmus, M. Erasmus
{"title":"A case study review and reasonability assessment of the foreign employment income tax exemption threshold in section 10(1)(o)(ii) of the Income Tax Act","authors":"Kgonthe Sebashe, Henriette Lynette Erasmus, M. Erasmus","doi":"10.1080/10291954.2020.1846860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper, by means of a case study, evaluated whether the foreign employment income tax exemption threshold in section 10(1)(o)(ii) of the Income Tax Act achieved its objectives: first, limiting the impact of the amendment to the exemption in respect of South African tax residents earning low or moderate levels of remuneration in either the United Arab Emirates (low-income tax rate jurisdiction) or the United Kingdom (high-income tax rate jurisdiction); and, second, spared tax residents earning remuneration in the United Kingdom of making additional ‘top-up’ tax payments to the South African Revenue Service. The case study assessed the tax position of a South African tax resident earning low, moderate or high levels of foreign remuneration in either the United Arab Emirates or United Kingdom, based on three mutually exclusive assumptions: first, had the full exemption continued to apply (as was effective on 29 February 2020); second, had the exemption threshold applied (effective from 1 March 2020, in terms of the 2020 Budget Review; not yet legislated at the time of writing the research paper); and, third, had the exemption, in full, been repealed (as proposed in terms of the Draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill of 2017). The reasonability of the current threshold value was assessed by comparing it to the minimum threshold value required to achieve a break-even tax position in the Republic.","PeriodicalId":43731,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"250 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10291954.2020.1846860","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2020.1846860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research paper, by means of a case study, evaluated whether the foreign employment income tax exemption threshold in section 10(1)(o)(ii) of the Income Tax Act achieved its objectives: first, limiting the impact of the amendment to the exemption in respect of South African tax residents earning low or moderate levels of remuneration in either the United Arab Emirates (low-income tax rate jurisdiction) or the United Kingdom (high-income tax rate jurisdiction); and, second, spared tax residents earning remuneration in the United Kingdom of making additional ‘top-up’ tax payments to the South African Revenue Service. The case study assessed the tax position of a South African tax resident earning low, moderate or high levels of foreign remuneration in either the United Arab Emirates or United Kingdom, based on three mutually exclusive assumptions: first, had the full exemption continued to apply (as was effective on 29 February 2020); second, had the exemption threshold applied (effective from 1 March 2020, in terms of the 2020 Budget Review; not yet legislated at the time of writing the research paper); and, third, had the exemption, in full, been repealed (as proposed in terms of the Draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill of 2017). The reasonability of the current threshold value was assessed by comparing it to the minimum threshold value required to achieve a break-even tax position in the Republic.
《所得税法》第10(1)(o)(ii)条中外国就业所得税免税起征点的案例研究审查和合理性评估
本研究论文通过案例研究,评估了《所得税法》第10(1)(o)(ii)条中规定的外国就业所得税豁免门槛是否实现了其目标:首先,限制了对在阿拉伯联合酋长国(低收入税率管辖区)或英国(高收入税率管辖区)赚取低或中等薪酬的南非纳税居民豁免修正案的影响;其次,在英国赚取报酬的纳税居民无需向南非税务局缴纳额外的“补足”税款。该案例研究基于三个相互排斥的假设,评估了在阿拉伯联合酋长国或英国赚取低、中等或高水平外国报酬的南非纳税居民的税收状况:首先,是否继续适用全额豁免(自2020年2月29日起生效);第二,适用豁免门槛(根据2020年预算审查,从2020年3月1日起生效);在撰写研究论文时尚未立法);第三,豁免是否被完全废除(如2017年税法修正案草案所提议的那样)。目前起征点的合理性是通过将其与在共和国实现收支平衡所需的最低起征点进行比较来评估的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信