Struggles with Dramatic Form in 16th-Century English Biblical Plays

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Anglica Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.7311/0860-5734.31.1.01
J. Matyjaszczyk
{"title":"Struggles with Dramatic Form in 16th-Century English Biblical Plays","authors":"J. Matyjaszczyk","doi":"10.7311/0860-5734.31.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to pinpoint how 16th-century biblical drama tried to appropriate its genre and medium to carry the reformist message and in what sense the project turned out to be a self-defeating one. The analysis of selected plays from reformed biblical cycles (The Chester Mystery Cycle, play iv; and “The Norwich Grocers’ Play”) and newly composed drama (John Bale’s plays, Lewis Wager’s Life and Repentaunce of Marie Magdalene, the anonymous “History of Jacob and Esau”), supported with an over- view of the criticism on the matter, reveals some common tensions in the dramatic texts which may have had their roots in the reformist need to eliminate any room for doubt that a theatrical performance could leave. The conclusion is that, in its attempts at striking the right balance between dramatizing and overt sermonizing, engaging and distancing, as well as providing an immersive experience and discouraging it, post-Reformation Scrip- ture-based drama oscillated between being more effective as a performance or as a carrier of the doctrinal message, with the resulting tendency to subvert either the former or the latter.","PeriodicalId":36615,"journal":{"name":"Anglica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.31.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to pinpoint how 16th-century biblical drama tried to appropriate its genre and medium to carry the reformist message and in what sense the project turned out to be a self-defeating one. The analysis of selected plays from reformed biblical cycles (The Chester Mystery Cycle, play iv; and “The Norwich Grocers’ Play”) and newly composed drama (John Bale’s plays, Lewis Wager’s Life and Repentaunce of Marie Magdalene, the anonymous “History of Jacob and Esau”), supported with an over- view of the criticism on the matter, reveals some common tensions in the dramatic texts which may have had their roots in the reformist need to eliminate any room for doubt that a theatrical performance could leave. The conclusion is that, in its attempts at striking the right balance between dramatizing and overt sermonizing, engaging and distancing, as well as providing an immersive experience and discouraging it, post-Reformation Scrip- ture-based drama oscillated between being more effective as a performance or as a carrier of the doctrinal message, with the resulting tendency to subvert either the former or the latter.
16世纪英国圣经戏剧与戏剧形式的斗争
这篇文章的目的是指出16世纪的圣经戏剧是如何试图利用其类型和媒介来传达改革派的信息,以及在什么意义上,这个项目最终成为一个弄巧成拙的项目。改革后的《圣经》循环选剧分析(《切斯特神秘循环》第四幕;《诺维奇杂货店的戏剧》)和新创作的戏剧(约翰·贝尔的戏剧,刘易斯·韦格的《抹大拉的玛丽的生活和忏悔》,匿名的《雅各和以扫的历史》),在对这个问题的批评的总体看法的支持下,揭示了戏剧文本中一些共同的紧张关系,这些紧张关系可能源于改革派需要消除戏剧表演可能留下的任何怀疑空间。结论是,为了在戏剧化和公开说教、引人入胜和保持距离、提供身临其境的体验和劝阻这种体验之间取得适当的平衡,宗教改革后以圣经为基础的戏剧在作为表演更有效或作为教义信息的载体之间摇摆不定,其结果是颠覆前者或后者的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anglica
Anglica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信