Why and How Do Sojourners Talk about Macao? Effects of Perceived Risk and Expected Benefit

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Suh-hee Choi, Lisa Tam, K. Ayhan, Dong-Min Lee
{"title":"Why and How Do Sojourners Talk about Macao? Effects of Perceived Risk and Expected Benefit","authors":"Suh-hee Choi, Lisa Tam, K. Ayhan, Dong-Min Lee","doi":"10.16934/isr.20.2.201912.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the growing popularity of digital platforms, social media conversations have been proposed and used as an indicator of public diplomacy outcomes. Despite this, existing research has found that most publics were unwilling to engage with foreign countries on social media. Considering this, this study seeks to identify factors that motivate and/or constrain individuals’ engagement in conversations about foreign countries. A survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted with sojourners who temporarily resided in Macao. When choosing how (i.e., channels) and what (i.e., content) to transmit, they managed the tension between perceived risk and expected benefit. Reflecting the theory of planned behavior, where individuals’ motivation (i.e., intended outcomes) and perceived behavioral control (i.e., ability to manage the tension between perceived risk and expected benefit to achieve such intended outcomes) predict behavioral intentions, the findings unveil the limitations of monitoring and tracking social media conversations as an indicator of public diplomacy outcomes.","PeriodicalId":37023,"journal":{"name":"Asian International Studies Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian International Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16934/isr.20.2.201912.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Due to the growing popularity of digital platforms, social media conversations have been proposed and used as an indicator of public diplomacy outcomes. Despite this, existing research has found that most publics were unwilling to engage with foreign countries on social media. Considering this, this study seeks to identify factors that motivate and/or constrain individuals’ engagement in conversations about foreign countries. A survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted with sojourners who temporarily resided in Macao. When choosing how (i.e., channels) and what (i.e., content) to transmit, they managed the tension between perceived risk and expected benefit. Reflecting the theory of planned behavior, where individuals’ motivation (i.e., intended outcomes) and perceived behavioral control (i.e., ability to manage the tension between perceived risk and expected benefit to achieve such intended outcomes) predict behavioral intentions, the findings unveil the limitations of monitoring and tracking social media conversations as an indicator of public diplomacy outcomes.
外国人为何谈论澳门?如何谈论澳门?感知风险和预期收益的影响
由于数字平台的日益普及,社交媒体对话已被提出并用作公共外交成果的指标。尽管如此,现有的研究发现,大多数公众不愿意在社交媒体上与外国接触。考虑到这一点,本研究试图确定激励和/或限制个人参与有关外国的对话的因素。研究人员对在澳门临时居留的人士进行了调查和半结构化访谈。在选择如何(即渠道)和传播什么(即内容)时,他们管理了感知风险和预期收益之间的紧张关系。研究结果反映了计划行为理论,即个人的动机(即预期结果)和感知行为控制(即管理感知风险和预期收益之间的紧张关系以实现预期结果的能力)预测行为意图,揭示了监控和跟踪社交媒体对话作为公共外交结果指标的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian International Studies Review
Asian International Studies Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信