Brexit. Tra diritto e politica Federico Fabbrini. Società editrice il Mulino, 2021, 144 p., €13, ISBN: 978-88-15-29129-5

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Andrea Volpe
{"title":"Brexit. Tra diritto e politica Federico Fabbrini. Società editrice il Mulino, 2021, 144 p., €13, ISBN: 978-88-15-29129-5","authors":"Andrea Volpe","doi":"10.1017/ipo.2021.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brexit has represented one of the most debated and controversial events in the history of European integration. For the first time, a member state decided to withdraw from the EU, questioning the vision of a linear development of the integration process and certifying the crisis of the ideal of supranationality in comparison with a revival of nationalist and sovereign thrusts. Since the outcome of the June 2016 Referendum made apparent the will of the majority of the British people to leave the EU, scholars throughout the world have proposed various analysis and interpretation in order to deepen this unprecedented phenomenon, but the considerable complexity that has characterized the Brexit process since its early stages has often produced frustration and created a general lack of comprehension of this event from the audience. Federico Fabbrini, Full Professor of European Law at the School of Law & Government of Dublin City University (DCU) and Principal of the Brexit Institute, tries to dispel the frequent doubts on this topic publishing a pocket-sized volume entitled ‘Brexit. Tra diritto e politica’ in which he offers a concise, extremely complete and exhaustive account of the main steps that characterized the process of the UK’s exit from the EU. The originality of this work lies in the multidisciplinary methodological approach that Fabbrini chose for the drafting of the book, combining both political and institutional elements with considerations relating to Law and Economics. In fact, as the author explains in the introduction of the text, a multidisciplinary analysis results the most appropriate in order to fully capture the dynamics that have influenced a complex process such as Brexit (p. 14). According to Fabbrini, while the economic elements were proving marginal in the definition of Brexit, this last was being mostly influenced by an intersection of juridical and political mechanisms. In fact, although Brexit was primarily a political act, animated by the sovereign and populist aspiration to ‘take back control’ of the country, rejecting the dynamics of transnational interdependence, the modalities with which the UK left the EU, and the terms of the withdrawal agreement itself, have been strongly influenced by legal considerations, mainly related to the specificity of the constitutional system in force in the UK and the peculiarities of the European Law. The 10 chapters of the book can be divided into three parts: in the first (ch.1-3), the author tries to identify the political reasons for the alleged Euroscepticism of the UK by briefly retracing the historical relationship between the UK and the EU, from the early stages of the process of European integration to the fateful 2016 Referendum. In the second section (ch. 4-6), Fabbrini analyzes the negotiation processes and the UK’s withdrawal agreement from the EU, identifying the elements that determined a sharp contrast between the political aspirations of the supporters of Brexit to sever ties with the EU and the stringent legal constraints that make this target practically impossible. The final part (ch. 7-10) is instead dedicated to final reflections on the advantages of the EU and the difficulties of leaving it, also in the light of the Italian debate on Europe.","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ipo.2021.18","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brexit has represented one of the most debated and controversial events in the history of European integration. For the first time, a member state decided to withdraw from the EU, questioning the vision of a linear development of the integration process and certifying the crisis of the ideal of supranationality in comparison with a revival of nationalist and sovereign thrusts. Since the outcome of the June 2016 Referendum made apparent the will of the majority of the British people to leave the EU, scholars throughout the world have proposed various analysis and interpretation in order to deepen this unprecedented phenomenon, but the considerable complexity that has characterized the Brexit process since its early stages has often produced frustration and created a general lack of comprehension of this event from the audience. Federico Fabbrini, Full Professor of European Law at the School of Law & Government of Dublin City University (DCU) and Principal of the Brexit Institute, tries to dispel the frequent doubts on this topic publishing a pocket-sized volume entitled ‘Brexit. Tra diritto e politica’ in which he offers a concise, extremely complete and exhaustive account of the main steps that characterized the process of the UK’s exit from the EU. The originality of this work lies in the multidisciplinary methodological approach that Fabbrini chose for the drafting of the book, combining both political and institutional elements with considerations relating to Law and Economics. In fact, as the author explains in the introduction of the text, a multidisciplinary analysis results the most appropriate in order to fully capture the dynamics that have influenced a complex process such as Brexit (p. 14). According to Fabbrini, while the economic elements were proving marginal in the definition of Brexit, this last was being mostly influenced by an intersection of juridical and political mechanisms. In fact, although Brexit was primarily a political act, animated by the sovereign and populist aspiration to ‘take back control’ of the country, rejecting the dynamics of transnational interdependence, the modalities with which the UK left the EU, and the terms of the withdrawal agreement itself, have been strongly influenced by legal considerations, mainly related to the specificity of the constitutional system in force in the UK and the peculiarities of the European Law. The 10 chapters of the book can be divided into three parts: in the first (ch.1-3), the author tries to identify the political reasons for the alleged Euroscepticism of the UK by briefly retracing the historical relationship between the UK and the EU, from the early stages of the process of European integration to the fateful 2016 Referendum. In the second section (ch. 4-6), Fabbrini analyzes the negotiation processes and the UK’s withdrawal agreement from the EU, identifying the elements that determined a sharp contrast between the political aspirations of the supporters of Brexit to sever ties with the EU and the stringent legal constraints that make this target practically impossible. The final part (ch. 7-10) is instead dedicated to final reflections on the advantages of the EU and the difficulties of leaving it, also in the light of the Italian debate on Europe.
英国脱欧。在法律和政治之间费德里科·法布里尼。Societàeditrice il Mulino,2021,144页,13欧元,国际标准图书编号:978-88-15-29129-5
英国脱欧是欧洲一体化历史上最具争议性的事件之一。有史以来第一次,一个成员国决定退出欧盟,这对一体化进程线性发展的愿景提出了质疑,与民族主义和主权主义的复兴相比,证明了超国家理想的危机。自2016年6月的公投结果明确表明大多数英国人离开欧盟的意愿以来,世界各地的学者提出了各种分析和解释,以深化这一前所未有的现象,但英国脱欧进程自早期阶段以来所具有的相当复杂的特征经常产生挫败感,并造成观众普遍缺乏对这一事件的理解。都柏林城市大学(DCU)法律与政府学院欧洲法正教授、英国脱欧研究所所长费德里科·法布里尼(Federico Fabbrini)出版了一本袖珍书《英国脱欧》(Brexit),试图消除人们对这一主题的疑虑。在这本书中,他对英国脱欧过程中的主要步骤进行了简明、极其完整和详尽的描述。这项工作的独创性在于法布里尼在起草这本书时选择的多学科方法方法,将政治和制度因素与法律和经济学相关的考虑结合起来。事实上,正如作者在前言中所解释的那样,多学科分析的结果是最合适的,以便充分捕捉影响英国脱欧等复杂过程的动态(第14页)。法布里尼认为,虽然经济因素在英国脱欧的定义中被证明是边缘化的,但最后一个因素主要受到司法和政治机制交叉作用的影响。事实上,尽管英国脱欧主要是一种政治行为,受到主权和民粹主义“夺回控制权”的愿望的推动,拒绝跨国相互依存的动力,英国离开欧盟的方式,以及退出协议本身的条款,受到法律考虑的强烈影响,主要与英国现行宪法制度的特殊性和欧洲法律的特殊性有关。本书共有10章,可分为三部分:第一部分(第1-3章),作者试图通过简要回顾英国与欧盟之间的历史关系,从欧洲一体化进程的早期阶段到2016年决定性的公投,来确定英国所谓的欧洲怀疑主义的政治原因。在第二部分(第4-6章)中,法布里尼分析了谈判过程和英国退出欧盟的协议,确定了决定英国脱欧支持者与欧盟断绝关系的政治愿望与使这一目标实际上不可能实现的严格法律约束之间形成鲜明对比的因素。最后一部分(第7-10章)则以意大利关于欧洲的辩论为背景,对欧盟的优势和退出欧盟的困难进行了最后反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信