Efficacy and Safety of Basal-Supported Prandial GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy

IF 0.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Taichi Nagahisa, M. Tabata, S. Yamada
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Basal-Supported Prandial GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy","authors":"Taichi Nagahisa, M. Tabata, S. Yamada","doi":"10.4236/JDM.2017.73007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of basal-supported prandial GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy (BPT)* in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Patients with T2DM, who had previously received insulin injection therapy and who had had their treatment switched to BPT (liraglutide), were retrospectively recruited. The efficacy of BPT was assessed by determining changes in HbA1c, body weight and total daily insulin dose from baseline to 4 months after BPT initiation. Safety was assessed by comparing the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes at baseline and after 4 months. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyze changes in parameters throughout the study period. Results: Twenty-nine patients, previously treated with basal-supported oral therapy (BOT), basal-bolus insulin, or pre-mixed insulin, were recruited. When analyzed together, there was no change in HbA1c throughout the study period, but body weight decreased (baseline 68.8 ± 13.2 kg vs. month 4 67.3 ± 13.1 kg; p < 0.001). Total daily insulin dose decreased after 4 months (baseline 24.4 ± 15.5 U/day vs. month 4 14.7 ± 9.2 U/day; p < 0.001), and there was no change in the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes. Analysis was conducted within sub-groups based on previous treatment modality. In the BOT group, HbA1c decreased from baseline after 2 months and body weight did not change throughout the study period. In both the basal-bolus insulin group and the pre-mixed insulin group, HbA1c remained steady throughout and there was a decrease in body weight. No change in the frequency of hypoglycemia was observed in any of the sub-groups. Conclusion: BPT in T2DM was associated with weight loss without changes in glycemic control over 4 months, suggesting that it may be an effective and safe therapy.","PeriodicalId":51086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Database Management","volume":"07 1","pages":"86-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Database Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JDM.2017.73007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of basal-supported prandial GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy (BPT)* in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Patients with T2DM, who had previously received insulin injection therapy and who had had their treatment switched to BPT (liraglutide), were retrospectively recruited. The efficacy of BPT was assessed by determining changes in HbA1c, body weight and total daily insulin dose from baseline to 4 months after BPT initiation. Safety was assessed by comparing the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes at baseline and after 4 months. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyze changes in parameters throughout the study period. Results: Twenty-nine patients, previously treated with basal-supported oral therapy (BOT), basal-bolus insulin, or pre-mixed insulin, were recruited. When analyzed together, there was no change in HbA1c throughout the study period, but body weight decreased (baseline 68.8 ± 13.2 kg vs. month 4 67.3 ± 13.1 kg; p < 0.001). Total daily insulin dose decreased after 4 months (baseline 24.4 ± 15.5 U/day vs. month 4 14.7 ± 9.2 U/day; p < 0.001), and there was no change in the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes. Analysis was conducted within sub-groups based on previous treatment modality. In the BOT group, HbA1c decreased from baseline after 2 months and body weight did not change throughout the study period. In both the basal-bolus insulin group and the pre-mixed insulin group, HbA1c remained steady throughout and there was a decrease in body weight. No change in the frequency of hypoglycemia was observed in any of the sub-groups. Conclusion: BPT in T2DM was associated with weight loss without changes in glycemic control over 4 months, suggesting that it may be an effective and safe therapy.
基础支持的Prandial GLP-1受体激动剂治疗的有效性和安全性
目的:评价基础支持型膳食GLP-1受体激动剂治疗(BPT)*治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性招募先前接受胰岛素注射治疗并已改用利拉鲁肽治疗的T2DM患者。BPT的疗效通过测定HbA1c、体重和BPT开始后从基线到4个月的每日总胰岛素剂量的变化来评估。通过比较基线和4个月后低血糖发作的频率来评估安全性。使用Wilcoxon检验来分析整个研究期间参数的变化。结果:招募了29名先前接受过基础支持口服治疗(BOT)、基础胰岛素或预混合胰岛素治疗的患者。综合分析,在整个研究期间,HbA1c没有变化,但体重下降(基线68.8±13.2 kg vs.第4个月67.3±13.1 kg;P < 0.001)。4个月后总胰岛素日剂量下降(基线24.4±15.5 U/天vs.第4个月14.7±9.2 U/天;P < 0.001),低血糖发作的频率没有变化。根据以往的治疗方式进行分组分析。在BOT组中,HbA1c在2个月后从基线下降,体重在整个研究期间没有变化。在基础注射胰岛素组和预混合胰岛素组中,HbA1c始终保持稳定,体重下降。在任何亚组中均未观察到低血糖发生率的变化。结论:BPT治疗T2DM患者4个月后体重减轻,血糖控制无变化,提示BPT可能是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Database Management
Journal of Database Management 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
23.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Database Management (JDM) publishes original research on all aspects of database management, design science, systems analysis and design, and software engineering. The primary mission of JDM is to be instrumental in the improvement and development of theory and practice related to information technology, information systems, and management of knowledge resources. The journal is targeted at both academic researchers and practicing IT professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信