{"title":"La escritura retroactiva de la historia: Žižek sobre Hegel","authors":"B. M. Pérez","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4072302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Žižek affirms Hegel’s present-day value since he understands that the transcendental Kantian discovery, opening up an abyss between subject and substance, constitutes the ‘traumatic core’ of contemporary philosophy and that the Hegelian response to it is the only satisfying one. This contribution tries, first of all, to explain the Žižekian interpretation of this response as a “metaphysics of the not-all.” According to Žižek, Hegel faces this transcendental challenge, inasmuch as he covers the distance between substance and subject, but in doing so, he demonstrates that their relation has the form of a paradox or that their unity rests on a cleft. Starting from here, the article explains the Žižekian reconstruction of the dialectical movement as a ‘run-in’ in which logos (of the subject) clashes with that (substantial) cleft that transcends it and, nonetheless, proves itself as its innermost core. This ‘run-in’, thus, enlightens the dialectical inversion as a radical overturn, which guarantees the opening of sense. Finally, by translating this linguistic structure into terms of action, this paper makes clear why Žižek defends that for Hegel the failure that essentially belongs to action, and because of which action goes necessarily through the ‘moment zero’ of history, guarantees the capacity action has to rewrite history and open up a new age.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4072302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Žižek affirms Hegel’s present-day value since he understands that the transcendental Kantian discovery, opening up an abyss between subject and substance, constitutes the ‘traumatic core’ of contemporary philosophy and that the Hegelian response to it is the only satisfying one. This contribution tries, first of all, to explain the Žižekian interpretation of this response as a “metaphysics of the not-all.” According to Žižek, Hegel faces this transcendental challenge, inasmuch as he covers the distance between substance and subject, but in doing so, he demonstrates that their relation has the form of a paradox or that their unity rests on a cleft. Starting from here, the article explains the Žižekian reconstruction of the dialectical movement as a ‘run-in’ in which logos (of the subject) clashes with that (substantial) cleft that transcends it and, nonetheless, proves itself as its innermost core. This ‘run-in’, thus, enlightens the dialectical inversion as a radical overturn, which guarantees the opening of sense. Finally, by translating this linguistic structure into terms of action, this paper makes clear why Žižek defends that for Hegel the failure that essentially belongs to action, and because of which action goes necessarily through the ‘moment zero’ of history, guarantees the capacity action has to rewrite history and open up a new age.
期刊介绍:
Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.