The Early Holocene archaeology of Florida: geospatial approaches to understanding Bolen mobility

Q1 Social Sciences
Jessi J. Halligan, David K. Thulman, A. Burke, Morgan F. Smith
{"title":"The Early Holocene archaeology of Florida: geospatial approaches to understanding Bolen mobility","authors":"Jessi J. Halligan, David K. Thulman, A. Burke, Morgan F. Smith","doi":"10.1080/0734578X.2022.2163120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Three of the most influential archaeological models in the southeastern US have argued that early foragers organized their lifeways via seasonal movement along major drainage basins; around access to raw material sources, crossing drainage basins; or around group foraging needs, following central place foraging models. We examine the distribution of Early Holocene Bolen sites in Florida in light of these models by combining Florida Master Site File data with avocational collection data and conducting spatial analyses. It is not clear to what extent the models are applicable to this low-relief area with comparatively ubiquitous toolstone, little data on seasonality, and rivers that likely were not flowing. Our analyses suggest that Bolen site distribution is highly patterned, with a few extremely large sites clustered around water sources and numerous single artifact finds in more remote areas. Our interpretation is that Bolen represents a population increase coincident with greater surface water availability that facilitated regular aggregations. The spacing of large sites indicates to us local-group territories, each of which had toolstone resources and reliable water. North Florida may present a more general organizing principle that applies throughout the Southeast: water, seasonal variation, and toolstone availability.","PeriodicalId":34945,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578X.2022.2163120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three of the most influential archaeological models in the southeastern US have argued that early foragers organized their lifeways via seasonal movement along major drainage basins; around access to raw material sources, crossing drainage basins; or around group foraging needs, following central place foraging models. We examine the distribution of Early Holocene Bolen sites in Florida in light of these models by combining Florida Master Site File data with avocational collection data and conducting spatial analyses. It is not clear to what extent the models are applicable to this low-relief area with comparatively ubiquitous toolstone, little data on seasonality, and rivers that likely were not flowing. Our analyses suggest that Bolen site distribution is highly patterned, with a few extremely large sites clustered around water sources and numerous single artifact finds in more remote areas. Our interpretation is that Bolen represents a population increase coincident with greater surface water availability that facilitated regular aggregations. The spacing of large sites indicates to us local-group territories, each of which had toolstone resources and reliable water. North Florida may present a more general organizing principle that applies throughout the Southeast: water, seasonal variation, and toolstone availability.
佛罗里达州全新世早期考古:了解博伦流动性的地理空间方法
摘要美国东南部三个最具影响力的考古模型认为,早期觅食者通过主要流域的季节性运动来组织他们的生活方式;绕过原材料来源,穿越流域;或围绕群体觅食需求,遵循中心位置觅食模型。根据这些模型,我们将佛罗里达州主遗址文件数据与业余收集数据相结合,并进行空间分析,研究了佛罗里达州全新世早期博伦遗址的分布。目前尚不清楚这些模型在多大程度上适用于这个低海拔地区,该地区的工具石相对普遍,季节性数据很少,河流可能没有流动。我们的分析表明,博伦遗址的分布具有高度的模式性,在水源周围聚集了一些非常大的遗址,在更偏远的地区发现了许多单一的人工制品。我们的解释是,博伦代表了人口的增加,同时地表水的可用性增加,这有助于定期聚集。大型场地的间距向我们表明了当地的群体领地,每个地方都有工具石资源和可靠的水源。北佛罗里达州可能会提出一个适用于整个东南部的更通用的组织原则:水、季节变化和工具石可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southeastern Archaeology
Southeastern Archaeology Social Sciences-Archeology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Southeastern Archaeology is a refereed journal that publishes works concerning the archaeology and history of southeastern North America and neighboring regions. It covers all time periods, from Paleoindian to recent history and defines the southeast broadly; this could be anything from Florida (south) to Wisconsin (North) and from Oklahoma (west) to Virginia (east). Reports or articles that cover neighboring regions such as the Northeast, Plains, or Caribbean would be considered if they had sufficient relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信