Measuring Color Perception through Laser Mitigation Coatings on Aircraft Windshields

Q3 Social Sciences
Stanley L. Harriman, Randal J. DeMik, Ryan S. Phillips, Suling Li, Megan M. Zahos, Nick P. Kazanjian, Ehteshamuddin Arif, M. Wolfrum, Joseph E. Burlas, Bobby Hill
{"title":"Measuring Color Perception through Laser Mitigation Coatings on Aircraft Windshields","authors":"Stanley L. Harriman, Randal J. DeMik, Ryan S. Phillips, Suling Li, Megan M. Zahos, Nick P. Kazanjian, Ehteshamuddin Arif, M. Wolfrum, Joseph E. Burlas, Bobby Hill","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground-based laser illuminations directed towards arriving and departing aircraft have increased in the past decade. A laser aimed at the windshield of an aircraft may distract a pilot and compromise safety. Previous studies provided empirical evidence of laser intensity in the flight deck from ground-based laser illumination events and the potential for adverse effects to flight safety. Most recent studies focused on testing the application of various coatings to aircraft windshields in order to reduce the effects of laser exposure to crewmembers. Safe and efficient flight operations depend on the ability of a pilot to see normal spectrums of color. Therefore, this study used the Ishihara Pseudoisochromatic Plates Color Vision Test to investigate participants’ color perception through an aircraft windshield coated with a photoresponsive nanocomposite film designed to reduce laser intensity from entering a flight deck. This study tested the hypothesis that there were no differences between color vision test scores when conducting trials with coated and non-coated windshields. Participants were individuals who held a current FAA medical certificate and held a minimum of a student pilot certificate (N = 104). Data analysis consisted of a repeated measures design that included within-subjects factors where each of the participants was tested from two trials, each under two conditions: coated and non-coated. The order of trials was altered using a counterbalancing technique which also provided a between-subjects factor. A paired-samples t-test was calculated to compare the mean of error by participants when taking the Ishihara Test through the non-coated windshield to the mean of the error by participants when taking the test through the coated windshield. No significant difference from the non-coated to the coated windshield was found (t(103) = 1.274, p > 0.05, n = 104). Findings suggest that effective color vision can be maintained through photoresponsive nanocomposite coatings.","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.18.100502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ground-based laser illuminations directed towards arriving and departing aircraft have increased in the past decade. A laser aimed at the windshield of an aircraft may distract a pilot and compromise safety. Previous studies provided empirical evidence of laser intensity in the flight deck from ground-based laser illumination events and the potential for adverse effects to flight safety. Most recent studies focused on testing the application of various coatings to aircraft windshields in order to reduce the effects of laser exposure to crewmembers. Safe and efficient flight operations depend on the ability of a pilot to see normal spectrums of color. Therefore, this study used the Ishihara Pseudoisochromatic Plates Color Vision Test to investigate participants’ color perception through an aircraft windshield coated with a photoresponsive nanocomposite film designed to reduce laser intensity from entering a flight deck. This study tested the hypothesis that there were no differences between color vision test scores when conducting trials with coated and non-coated windshields. Participants were individuals who held a current FAA medical certificate and held a minimum of a student pilot certificate (N = 104). Data analysis consisted of a repeated measures design that included within-subjects factors where each of the participants was tested from two trials, each under two conditions: coated and non-coated. The order of trials was altered using a counterbalancing technique which also provided a between-subjects factor. A paired-samples t-test was calculated to compare the mean of error by participants when taking the Ishihara Test through the non-coated windshield to the mean of the error by participants when taking the test through the coated windshield. No significant difference from the non-coated to the coated windshield was found (t(103) = 1.274, p > 0.05, n = 104). Findings suggest that effective color vision can be maintained through photoresponsive nanocomposite coatings.
通过飞机挡风玻璃上的激光减缓涂层测量颜色感知
在过去十年中,针对抵港和离港飞机的地面激光照明有所增加。瞄准飞机挡风玻璃的激光可能会分散飞行员的注意力,危及安全。先前的研究提供了地面激光照射事件中飞行甲板激光强度的经验证据,以及对飞行安全的潜在不利影响。最近的研究集中在测试各种涂层在飞机挡风玻璃上的应用,以减少激光照射对机组人员的影响。安全有效的飞行操作取决于飞行员看到正常光谱的能力。因此,本研究使用石原伪等色板色觉测试来研究参与者通过涂有光响应纳米复合薄膜的飞机挡风玻璃的色觉,该薄膜旨在降低进入飞行甲板的激光强度。这项研究验证了这样一种假设,即在使用涂层和非涂层挡风玻璃进行试验时,色觉测试分数之间没有差异。参与者是持有美国联邦航空管理局现行医疗证书并至少持有学生飞行员证书的个人(N=104)。数据分析包括重复测量设计,其中包括受试者内部的因素,其中每个参与者都在两种条件下接受了两次试验的测试:涂层和非涂层。使用平衡技术改变了试验顺序,该技术还提供了受试者之间的因素。计算成对样本t检验,以比较参与者在通过无涂层挡风玻璃进行石原测试时的误差平均值与参与者在通过涂层挡风玻璃测试时的错误平均值。无涂层挡风玻璃与有涂层挡风玻璃之间无显著差异(t(103)=1.274,p>0.05,n=104)。研究结果表明,通过光响应纳米复合涂层可以保持有效的色觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信