ARE “MODAL ADVERBS” AUTOMATICALLY MODAL MARKERS? THE CASE OF FRENCH CERTAINEMENT WITH ITS EPISTEMICO-MODAL AND ITS EVIDENTIAL USE

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
P. Dendale
{"title":"ARE “MODAL ADVERBS” AUTOMATICALLY MODAL MARKERS? THE CASE OF FRENCH CERTAINEMENT WITH ITS EPISTEMICO-MODAL AND ITS EVIDENTIAL USE","authors":"P. Dendale","doi":"10.1344/10.1344/AFEL2020.10.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The French adverb certainement (‘certainly’) is labelled a “modal adverb”. It has two (sentence adverb) uses according to the literature, called “strong modal use” and “weak modal use”. The strong modal use is indeed strong (epistemico-)modal in that it indicates total certainty, whether subjective or intersubjective. What is called its “weak modal use” is shown to be an evidential use. It indicates primarily that the content qualified by the adverb results from a non-monotonic inference, performed by the speaker, whose conclusions are plausible, defeasible, and thus never totally certain. This is due to the presence of an evidential-inferential component in its meaning. As for the so-called weak modal element of “probability” in its meaning, we reanalyse it as “non- certainty” and argue it is an element of utterance meaning, a property of quasi-assertions to which non-monotonically inferred content gives rise. Finally, we claim that the adverb also has a meaning component that we call “epistemic posture of certainty”, shown to be different from epistemic modality. On the basis of three parameters and their values, we show how certainementcan be interpreted, in a series of contextual configurations, either as an instance of its epistemico- modal use or of its evidential use.","PeriodicalId":40232,"journal":{"name":"Anuari de Filologia-Estudis de Linguistica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuari de Filologia-Estudis de Linguistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/10.1344/AFEL2020.10.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The French adverb certainement (‘certainly’) is labelled a “modal adverb”. It has two (sentence adverb) uses according to the literature, called “strong modal use” and “weak modal use”. The strong modal use is indeed strong (epistemico-)modal in that it indicates total certainty, whether subjective or intersubjective. What is called its “weak modal use” is shown to be an evidential use. It indicates primarily that the content qualified by the adverb results from a non-monotonic inference, performed by the speaker, whose conclusions are plausible, defeasible, and thus never totally certain. This is due to the presence of an evidential-inferential component in its meaning. As for the so-called weak modal element of “probability” in its meaning, we reanalyse it as “non- certainty” and argue it is an element of utterance meaning, a property of quasi-assertions to which non-monotonically inferred content gives rise. Finally, we claim that the adverb also has a meaning component that we call “epistemic posture of certainty”, shown to be different from epistemic modality. On the basis of three parameters and their values, we show how certainementcan be interpreted, in a series of contextual configurations, either as an instance of its epistemico- modal use or of its evidential use.
情态副词是自动的情态标记吗?法语确定性的案例及其认识论-模态及其证据用法
法语副词“确定”(certainly)被称为“语气副词”。根据文献记载,它有两种(句子副词)用法,称为“强语气用法”和“弱语气用法”。强模态使用确实是强(认知)模态,因为它表明了完全的确定性,无论是主观的还是主体间的。所谓的“弱模态使用”被证明是一种证据使用。它主要表明副词限定的内容是由说话人进行的非单调推理产生的,其结论是可信的、不可行的,因此从来都不是完全确定的。这是由于在其含义中存在证据-推理成分。关于“概率”在其意义上的所谓弱模态元素,我们将其重新分析为“不确定性”,并认为它是话语意义的一个元素,是非单调推理内容所产生的准断言的性质。最后,我们声称副词还有一个意义成分,我们称之为“确定性的认识姿态”,这与认识情态不同。基于三个参数及其值,我们展示了如何在一系列上下文配置中,将确定性解释为其认知模态使用或证据使用的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信