Analisis Newman dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Statistika Ditinjau dari Metakognitif Tacit Use

Raras Kartika Sari
{"title":"Analisis Newman dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Statistika Ditinjau dari Metakognitif Tacit Use","authors":"Raras Kartika Sari","doi":"10.21274/jtm.2018.1.2.157-166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted to analyze student errors in the statistical problem-solving process using Newman in terms of metacognitive tacit use. The research method used is qualitative method. Data analysis used is the analysis of the results of the test, questionnaire analysis and analysis of interview transcripts. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the subjects of tacit use metacognitive categories did not know their weaknesses in the learning process, gave inconsistent answers, had little confidence, focused only on answers and not on the process. Subjects with tacit use metacognitive categories made mistakes in solving statistical problems almost at all stages of Newman. Newman's error analysis consists of reading errors, comprehension errors, transformation errors, process skills errors, encoding errors. The subject is wrong in interpreting the symbol, the subject cannot determine what is known and asked about the question, the subject does not write detailed calculation steps, and the subject cannot conclude the final answer to the problem solving. Errors in completing the test questions occur because the subject does not re-check the answers given in the problem.","PeriodicalId":52842,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tadris Matematika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tadris Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2018.1.2.157-166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The study was conducted to analyze student errors in the statistical problem-solving process using Newman in terms of metacognitive tacit use. The research method used is qualitative method. Data analysis used is the analysis of the results of the test, questionnaire analysis and analysis of interview transcripts. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the subjects of tacit use metacognitive categories did not know their weaknesses in the learning process, gave inconsistent answers, had little confidence, focused only on answers and not on the process. Subjects with tacit use metacognitive categories made mistakes in solving statistical problems almost at all stages of Newman. Newman's error analysis consists of reading errors, comprehension errors, transformation errors, process skills errors, encoding errors. The subject is wrong in interpreting the symbol, the subject cannot determine what is known and asked about the question, the subject does not write detailed calculation steps, and the subject cannot conclude the final answer to the problem solving. Errors in completing the test questions occur because the subject does not re-check the answers given in the problem.
纽曼的分析从度量衡的角度对统计结果进行了权衡
本研究旨在从元认知默许的角度分析学生在使用Newman进行统计问题解决过程中的错误。所采用的研究方法是定性方法。使用的数据分析是对测试结果的分析、问卷分析和访谈笔录的分析。基于研究结果,可以得出结论,默会使用元认知类别的受试者不知道自己在学习过程中的弱点,给出的答案不一致,信心不足,只关注答案而不关注过程。具有默会使用元认知类别的受试者几乎在纽曼的所有阶段都在解决统计问题时出错。纽曼的错误分析包括阅读错误、理解错误、转换错误、加工技能错误和编码错误。受试者对符号的解释是错误的,受试者无法确定对问题的已知和询问,受试器没有写下详细的计算步骤,受试物无法得出解决问题的最终答案。由于受试者没有重新检查问题中给出的答案,所以在完成测试问题时会出现错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信