{"title":"The School of Salamanca. A case of global knowledge production","authors":"J. Hallebeek","doi":"10.1080/2049677X.2023.2207384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"employ. Boucoyannis’ case studies are drawn from England, France, Castile, Catalonia, Hungary, Flanders, Italy, the Ottoman Empire, and Russia. She offers brief consideration of ‘additional cases’ drawn from Holland, Poland, Sweden, Denmark, Swiss Cantons, and the Holy Roman Empire (25). Boucoyannis notes that organic arrangements in these cases frequently reflect opportunism at work. In the author’s words: ‘bargaining on taxes was equally common across regions’ (7). What matters–in her final assessment–is ‘power properly deployed’, that is, power deployed to justify the power to deploy power (318). This suggests that, over time, kings learned a great deal as judges. A national court system is a suitable place to acquire and refine the statecraft needed to innovate the state and extend its useful life. It is not a lesson confined to Westminster Hall.","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"11 1","pages":"92 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2023.2207384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
employ. Boucoyannis’ case studies are drawn from England, France, Castile, Catalonia, Hungary, Flanders, Italy, the Ottoman Empire, and Russia. She offers brief consideration of ‘additional cases’ drawn from Holland, Poland, Sweden, Denmark, Swiss Cantons, and the Holy Roman Empire (25). Boucoyannis notes that organic arrangements in these cases frequently reflect opportunism at work. In the author’s words: ‘bargaining on taxes was equally common across regions’ (7). What matters–in her final assessment–is ‘power properly deployed’, that is, power deployed to justify the power to deploy power (318). This suggests that, over time, kings learned a great deal as judges. A national court system is a suitable place to acquire and refine the statecraft needed to innovate the state and extend its useful life. It is not a lesson confined to Westminster Hall.
期刊介绍:
Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.