PERAN AHLI JIWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN PSIKIS DALAM RUMAH TANGGA

Y. Ohoiwutun, Fiska Maulidian Nugroho, S. Samsudi, Arief Dewanto
{"title":"PERAN AHLI JIWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN PSIKIS DALAM RUMAH TANGGA","authors":"Y. Ohoiwutun, Fiska Maulidian Nugroho, S. Samsudi, Arief Dewanto","doi":"10.25123/vej.v8i1.4443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domestic psychic violence can be experienced by everyone, including children, wives, husbands, and others. As a material offense on domestic psychic violence, the elements resulting from psychological trauma must be proven. Therefore, the intervention of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists is very important in cases of domestic psychic violence. The differences in the competence of psychologists and psychiatrists as well as the prospective roles of both professions in proving cases are the focus of the problems being studied. A normative legal research method with descriptive qualitative data analysis was employed in this research. The results showed that the existence of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists is very important for finding material truths that can be scientifically tested in cases of domestic psychic violence. As evidence for letters and/or expert reports, the assessment results of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists have accurate evidentiary value in forming a judge's conviction. This paper ends with a recommendation that as a form of protection for domestic violence victims, the role of psychologists and/or psychiatrists should be optimized, both in the pre-adjudication, and adjudication phases. In addition, considering the balanced position between psychologists and psychiatrists in law enforcement, this should not create jealousy and unhealthy competition between the two professions.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas et Justitia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v8i1.4443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domestic psychic violence can be experienced by everyone, including children, wives, husbands, and others. As a material offense on domestic psychic violence, the elements resulting from psychological trauma must be proven. Therefore, the intervention of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists is very important in cases of domestic psychic violence. The differences in the competence of psychologists and psychiatrists as well as the prospective roles of both professions in proving cases are the focus of the problems being studied. A normative legal research method with descriptive qualitative data analysis was employed in this research. The results showed that the existence of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists is very important for finding material truths that can be scientifically tested in cases of domestic psychic violence. As evidence for letters and/or expert reports, the assessment results of forensic psychologists and forensic psychiatrists have accurate evidentiary value in forming a judge's conviction. This paper ends with a recommendation that as a form of protection for domestic violence victims, the role of psychologists and/or psychiatrists should be optimized, both in the pre-adjudication, and adjudication phases. In addition, considering the balanced position between psychologists and psychiatrists in law enforcement, this should not create jealousy and unhealthy competition between the two professions.
对可能的植物进行另一种保险的措施
每个人都可能经历家庭心理暴力,包括孩子、妻子、丈夫和其他人。家庭心理暴力作为一种物质犯罪,其心理创伤因素必须得到证实。因此,在家庭精神暴力案件中,法医心理学家和法医精神病学家的干预是非常重要的。心理学家和精神病学家能力的差异,以及这两种职业在证明案件中的预期作用,是正在研究的问题的焦点。本研究采用规范的法律研究方法,结合描述性定性数据分析。研究结果表明,法医心理学家和法医精神病学家的存在对于在家庭精神暴力案件中找到可以科学检验的物质真相非常重要。作为信件和/或专家报告的证据,法医心理学家和法医精神病学家的评估结果对法官定罪具有准确的证据价值。本文最后建议,作为对家庭暴力受害者的一种保护形式,心理学家和/或精神病学家的作用应在裁决前和裁决阶段得到优化。此外,考虑到心理学家和精神病学家在执法中的平衡地位,这不应在两个职业之间造成嫉妒和不健康的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信