Role of Thoracoscore and ESOS in Prediction of Outcomes after Thoracic Surgeries

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Islam Morsy, Amr A Abdelwahab, Heba Salem, M. Elsharkawy, Hussein Gamal Almawardy
{"title":"Role of Thoracoscore and ESOS in Prediction of Outcomes after Thoracic Surgeries","authors":"Islam Morsy, Amr A Abdelwahab, Heba Salem, M. Elsharkawy, Hussein Gamal Almawardy","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2235148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The use of scores in thoracic surgery has been done recently. European Society Objective Score (ESOS) and Thoracoscore are the most popular scores used in thoracic operations. This work aimed to compare ESOS and Thoracoscore’s ability in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgery. Methods This retrospective study involved 282 cases who were admitted to thoracic surgery unit, Tanta University Hospitals and other hospitals whose Thoracoscore and ESOS were calculated from January 2017 to December 2022. Results Mortality rate at 30 days postoperative was 7.44% in our study. Pneumonectomy and MV (mechanical ventilation) were significantly associated with mortality (P value < 0.001). Thoracoscore can predict mortality (P value = 0.004 and AUC = 0.629) with 61.9% sensitivity, 56.70% specificity, 10.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 94.9% negative predictive value(NPV). ESOS can predict mortality (P value = 0.006 and AUC = 0.662) with 85.71% sensitivity, 37.55% specificity, 9.9% PPV and 97% NPV. ESOS was an independent significant predictor for mortality while Thoracoscore was not. Conclusions ESOS and Thoracoscore are applicable tools in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgeries. However, ESOS is more sensitive and more specific.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2235148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The use of scores in thoracic surgery has been done recently. European Society Objective Score (ESOS) and Thoracoscore are the most popular scores used in thoracic operations. This work aimed to compare ESOS and Thoracoscore’s ability in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgery. Methods This retrospective study involved 282 cases who were admitted to thoracic surgery unit, Tanta University Hospitals and other hospitals whose Thoracoscore and ESOS were calculated from January 2017 to December 2022. Results Mortality rate at 30 days postoperative was 7.44% in our study. Pneumonectomy and MV (mechanical ventilation) were significantly associated with mortality (P value < 0.001). Thoracoscore can predict mortality (P value = 0.004 and AUC = 0.629) with 61.9% sensitivity, 56.70% specificity, 10.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 94.9% negative predictive value(NPV). ESOS can predict mortality (P value = 0.006 and AUC = 0.662) with 85.71% sensitivity, 37.55% specificity, 9.9% PPV and 97% NPV. ESOS was an independent significant predictor for mortality while Thoracoscore was not. Conclusions ESOS and Thoracoscore are applicable tools in predicting the mortality after thoracic surgeries. However, ESOS is more sensitive and more specific.
胸腔镜和ESOS在预测胸科手术后疗效中的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信