Exploring the transfer of self-efficacy: academic self-efficacy predicts exercise and nutrition self-efficacy / Una exploración de la transferencia de la autoeficacia: la autoeficacia académica predice la autoeficacia nutritiva y del ejercicio físico

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
K. Massar, R. Malmberg
{"title":"Exploring the transfer of self-efficacy: academic self-efficacy predicts exercise and nutrition self-efficacy / Una exploración de la transferencia de la autoeficacia: la autoeficacia académica predice la autoeficacia nutritiva y del ejercicio físico","authors":"K. Massar, R. Malmberg","doi":"10.1080/02134748.2016.1248026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this research, we investigated the transfer of self-efficacy (SE) beliefs from one domain to another. Specifically, we explored whether academic SE beliefs might be able to predict exercise (Study 1) and nutrition (Study 2) SE. Additionally, to explore the underlying mechanisms, participants reported on domain confidence, perceived similarity and domain importance. Specifically, in Study 1, undergraduate students reported on their academic SE beliefs, confidence in the academic and exercise domains and their exercise SE beliefs (n = 50). In Study 2, participants reported on their academic SE beliefs, confidence in the academic and nutrition domains and their nutrition SE beliefs (n = 71). Moreover, in both studies, the perceived importance and the perceived similarity between domains were measured. Multiple regression analyses revealed that academic SE beliefs, academic confidence and exercise confidence were significant predictors of exercise SE beliefs (Study 1); for Study 2 nutrition SE was predicted by academic SE, academic confidence, nutrition confidence and nutrition importance diet. Additionally, we found a partial suppression effect in both studies: academic confidence strengthened the relationship between academic SE and exercise SE in Study 1, and between academic SE and nutrition SE in Study 2. Discussion focuses on the similarities and differences between the studies’ results and the implications for the literature.","PeriodicalId":42024,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicologia Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02134748.2016.1248026","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicologia Social","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2016.1248026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract In this research, we investigated the transfer of self-efficacy (SE) beliefs from one domain to another. Specifically, we explored whether academic SE beliefs might be able to predict exercise (Study 1) and nutrition (Study 2) SE. Additionally, to explore the underlying mechanisms, participants reported on domain confidence, perceived similarity and domain importance. Specifically, in Study 1, undergraduate students reported on their academic SE beliefs, confidence in the academic and exercise domains and their exercise SE beliefs (n = 50). In Study 2, participants reported on their academic SE beliefs, confidence in the academic and nutrition domains and their nutrition SE beliefs (n = 71). Moreover, in both studies, the perceived importance and the perceived similarity between domains were measured. Multiple regression analyses revealed that academic SE beliefs, academic confidence and exercise confidence were significant predictors of exercise SE beliefs (Study 1); for Study 2 nutrition SE was predicted by academic SE, academic confidence, nutrition confidence and nutrition importance diet. Additionally, we found a partial suppression effect in both studies: academic confidence strengthened the relationship between academic SE and exercise SE in Study 1, and between academic SE and nutrition SE in Study 2. Discussion focuses on the similarities and differences between the studies’ results and the implications for the literature.
探索自我效能的转移:学术自我效能预测运动与营养自我效能/自我效能转移的探索:学术自我效能预测营养与运动自我效能
摘要在本研究中,我们调查了自我效能(SE)信念从一个领域到另一个领域的转移。具体而言,我们探讨了学术SE信念是否能够预测运动(研究1)和营养(研究2)SE。此外,为了探索潜在机制,参与者报告了领域信心、感知相似性和领域重要性。具体而言,在研究1中,本科生报告了他们的学术SE信念、对学术和锻炼领域的信心以及他们的锻炼SE信念(n=50)。在研究2中,参与者报告了他们的学术SE信念、对学术和营养领域的信心以及他们的营养SE信念(n=71)。此外,在这两项研究中,测量了领域之间的感知重要性和感知相似性。多元回归分析显示,学业SE信念、学业信心和运动信心是运动SE信念的显著预测因素(研究1);对于研究2,通过学术SE、学术自信、营养自信和营养重要性饮食预测营养SE。此外,我们在两项研究中都发现了部分抑制作用:在研究1中,学术自信加强了学术SE和运动SE之间的关系,在研究2中,学术SE和营养SE之间的联系。讨论的重点是研究结果之间的异同以及对文献的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista De Psicologia Social
Revista De Psicologia Social PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信