Effect of logged forests on diet of small characids from Neotropical streams

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES
Diego Simeone
{"title":"Effect of logged forests on diet of small characids from Neotropical streams","authors":"Diego Simeone","doi":"10.1111/eff.12743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies relating to fish trophic ecology provide important insights regarding their life history. However, there is a lack of information linking fish diet composition with riparian cover in small streams. To investigate whether diet composition varied between streams with pristine and logged forests, I compared the food items consumed by four characid species: <i>Bryconops melanurus</i>, <i>Moenkhausia collettii</i>, <i>Moenkhausia dichroura,</i> and <i>Moenkhausia oligolepis</i>. I sampled 18 first-order streams in the eastern Amazon: six with pristine forest, six with conventional logging, and six with selective logging. All fish species were classified as omnivorous, with diverse food categories recorded in their diets: mainly terrestrial insects for <i>Moenkhausia</i> species and aquatic insect nymphs for <i>B. melanurus</i>. However, the relative importance of each category varied only in streams with conventional logged forests. In these streams, all fish species consumed mainly autochthonous items, especially aquatic insect nymphs. In addition, terrestrial insects and seeds were absent in these streams with reduced riparian cover. In summary, this study highlighted that fish diet in conventional logged forests strongly differed from areas with pristine and selective logged forests. This finding states that managed forests may support a diverse diet for fish community, similar to that found in pristine forests. Therefore, management and conservation strategies of riparian vegetation in Amazonian streams are important to maintain habitat and food quality, which may be associated with a diverse diet for fish species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11422,"journal":{"name":"Ecology of Freshwater Fish","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology of Freshwater Fish","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eff.12743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Studies relating to fish trophic ecology provide important insights regarding their life history. However, there is a lack of information linking fish diet composition with riparian cover in small streams. To investigate whether diet composition varied between streams with pristine and logged forests, I compared the food items consumed by four characid species: Bryconops melanurus, Moenkhausia collettii, Moenkhausia dichroura, and Moenkhausia oligolepis. I sampled 18 first-order streams in the eastern Amazon: six with pristine forest, six with conventional logging, and six with selective logging. All fish species were classified as omnivorous, with diverse food categories recorded in their diets: mainly terrestrial insects for Moenkhausia species and aquatic insect nymphs for B. melanurus. However, the relative importance of each category varied only in streams with conventional logged forests. In these streams, all fish species consumed mainly autochthonous items, especially aquatic insect nymphs. In addition, terrestrial insects and seeds were absent in these streams with reduced riparian cover. In summary, this study highlighted that fish diet in conventional logged forests strongly differed from areas with pristine and selective logged forests. This finding states that managed forests may support a diverse diet for fish community, similar to that found in pristine forests. Therefore, management and conservation strategies of riparian vegetation in Amazonian streams are important to maintain habitat and food quality, which may be associated with a diverse diet for fish species.

砍伐森林对新热带溪流中小型动物食性的影响
与鱼类营养生态学有关的研究为了解它们的生活史提供了重要的见解。然而,缺乏将鱼类饮食组成与小溪河岸覆盖物联系起来的信息。为了调查原始森林和砍伐森林的溪流之间的饮食组成是否存在差异,我比较了四个特征物种所消耗的食物:黑脉藻、Colletti Moenkhausia、dichroura Moenkhassia和oligolepis Moenkhaisia。我对亚马逊东部的18条一级溪流进行了采样:6条是原始森林,6条是常规伐木,还有6条是选择性伐木。所有鱼类都被归类为杂食性,其饮食中记录了不同的食物类别:Moenkhausia物种主要是陆生昆虫,B物种主要是水生若虫。 墨兰龙。然而,每一类的相对重要性只在有传统砍伐森林的溪流中有所不同。在这些溪流中,所有鱼类主要食用本地物品,尤其是水生若虫。此外,由于河岸覆盖减少,这些溪流中没有陆生昆虫和种子。总之,这项研究强调,传统砍伐森林中的鱼类饮食与原始和选择性砍伐森林的地区有很大不同。这一发现表明,有管理的森林可能支持鱼类群落的多样化饮食,类似于原始森林中的饮食。因此,亚马逊溪流河岸植被的管理和保护策略对于维持栖息地和食物质量很重要,这可能与鱼类的多样化饮食有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology of Freshwater Fish
Ecology of Freshwater Fish 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology of Freshwater Fish publishes original contributions on all aspects of fish ecology in freshwater environments, including lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and streams. Manuscripts involving ecologically-oriented studies of behavior, conservation, development, genetics, life history, physiology, and host-parasite interactions are welcomed. Studies involving population ecology and community ecology are also of interest, as are evolutionary approaches including studies of population biology, evolutionary ecology, behavioral ecology, and historical ecology. Papers addressing the life stages of anadromous and catadromous species in estuaries and inshore coastal zones are considered if they contribute to the general understanding of freshwater fish ecology. Theoretical and modeling studies are suitable if they generate testable hypotheses, as are those with implications for fisheries. Manuscripts presenting analyses of published data are considered if they produce novel conclusions or syntheses. The journal publishes articles, fresh perspectives, and reviews and, occasionally, the proceedings of conferences and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信