RETHINKING HOWARD M. FEDERSPIEL’S THESIS ON THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PERSATUAN ISLAM VS PERMOEFAKATAN ISLAM

P. I. Fauzan, A. K. Fata
{"title":"RETHINKING HOWARD M. FEDERSPIEL’S THESIS ON THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PERSATUAN ISLAM VS PERMOEFAKATAN ISLAM","authors":"P. I. Fauzan, A. K. Fata","doi":"10.30821/jcims.v5i1.8889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article discusses the thesis written by Howard M. Federspiel on the conflict between Persatuan Islam (PERSIS) and Permoefakatan Islam. This present study employed the historical methods of heuristic, historical critic, interpretation, historiography to examine Federspiel’s thesis by pointing out the new facts related to the initial history of PERSIS and its relationship with Permoefakatan Islam. It reveals that Permoefakatan Islam was not part of PERSIS. It was an entirely separate organization established in 1924 to accommodate the aspirations of the old and young generations. It was not a reaction due to presence of A. Hassan in PERSIS. PERSIS’s reformist character had always been there since its establishment as an organization, and A. Hassan’s presence emphasized this character.Keywords: Federspiel, PERSIS, Permoefakatan Islam, A. Hassan","PeriodicalId":52954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v5i1.8889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses the thesis written by Howard M. Federspiel on the conflict between Persatuan Islam (PERSIS) and Permoefakatan Islam. This present study employed the historical methods of heuristic, historical critic, interpretation, historiography to examine Federspiel’s thesis by pointing out the new facts related to the initial history of PERSIS and its relationship with Permoefakatan Islam. It reveals that Permoefakatan Islam was not part of PERSIS. It was an entirely separate organization established in 1924 to accommodate the aspirations of the old and young generations. It was not a reaction due to presence of A. Hassan in PERSIS. PERSIS’s reformist character had always been there since its establishment as an organization, and A. Hassan’s presence emphasized this character.Keywords: Federspiel, PERSIS, Permoefakatan Islam, A. Hassan
重新思考霍华德·m·费斯皮尔关于个人伊斯兰教与个人伊斯兰教之间冲突的论文
摘要:本文讨论了霍华德·m·费斯皮尔(Howard M. Federspiel)关于Persatuan Islam (PERSIS)与Permoefakatan Islam之间冲突的论文。本研究采用启发式、历史批判、解释、史学等历史方法,通过指出波斯的初始历史及其与伊斯兰教的关系的新事实,来检验费德斯皮尔的论点。它揭示了Permoefakatan伊斯兰教不是波斯的一部分。它是一个完全独立的组织,成立于1924年,以满足老一代和年轻一代的愿望。这并不是由于哈桑在波斯的出现而引起的反应。波斯的改革派特征从它作为一个组织成立以来就一直存在,而哈桑的出现更强调了这一特征。关键词:Federspiel,波斯,Permoefakatan Islam, A. Hassan
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信