A consistent approach for global buckling of steel structures

IF 1.2 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
J. Nonn, V. Wilden, M. Feldmann
{"title":"A consistent approach for global buckling of steel structures","authors":"J. Nonn, V. Wilden, M. Feldmann","doi":"10.1002/stco.202200040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ”General Method“ according to chapter 6.3.4 of EN1993‐1‐1 or 8.3.4 of prEN1993‐1‐1 deals with the verification of stability problems of frame and beam structures with loadings in‐plane. The ”General method“ according to Eurocode is intended for the general case of a combined moment and normal force. For the choice of the reduction factor χop, there are two options for applying the reduction curve, either the minimum of lateral torsional buckling (LTB) and flexural buckling (FB) or a weighted combination of both. With the use of analytical derivations, it can be shown that this approach leads to inconsistencies which can possibly lead to incorrect results. In this paper an alternative approach is presented which leads to unification and fully mechanical justification in verification. The approach allows e.g. the verification of stability of an entire frame system directly and without interaction factors (as in the equivalent member method). In addition, the issue of a consistent equivalent imperfection is addressed. With the use of this method, geometrical non‐linear analyses of structures showing out‐of‐plane instability can be omitted; only an in‐plane calculation and a determination of a linear buckling analysis is necessary. Finally, examples are presented in this paper that demonstrate the application of the approach shown.","PeriodicalId":54183,"journal":{"name":"Steel Construction-Design and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Steel Construction-Design and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.202200040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ”General Method“ according to chapter 6.3.4 of EN1993‐1‐1 or 8.3.4 of prEN1993‐1‐1 deals with the verification of stability problems of frame and beam structures with loadings in‐plane. The ”General method“ according to Eurocode is intended for the general case of a combined moment and normal force. For the choice of the reduction factor χop, there are two options for applying the reduction curve, either the minimum of lateral torsional buckling (LTB) and flexural buckling (FB) or a weighted combination of both. With the use of analytical derivations, it can be shown that this approach leads to inconsistencies which can possibly lead to incorrect results. In this paper an alternative approach is presented which leads to unification and fully mechanical justification in verification. The approach allows e.g. the verification of stability of an entire frame system directly and without interaction factors (as in the equivalent member method). In addition, the issue of a consistent equivalent imperfection is addressed. With the use of this method, geometrical non‐linear analyses of structures showing out‐of‐plane instability can be omitted; only an in‐plane calculation and a determination of a linear buckling analysis is necessary. Finally, examples are presented in this paper that demonstrate the application of the approach shown.
钢结构整体屈曲的一致方法
根据EN1993‐1‐1第6.3.4章或prEN1993‐1‐1第8.3.4章的“一般方法”处理具有平面荷载的框架和梁结构的稳定性问题的验证。根据欧洲规范,“一般方法”适用于力矩和法向力组合的一般情况。对于折减系数χop的选择,应用折减曲线有两种选择,要么是侧向扭转屈曲(LTB)和弯曲屈曲(FB)的最小值,要么是两者的加权组合。通过使用解析推导,可以证明这种方法会导致不一致,从而可能导致不正确的结果。本文提出了另一种方法,这种方法可以在验证中实现统一和完全机械的证明。例如,该方法允许直接验证整个框架系统的稳定性,而不需要相互作用因素(如等效成员法)。此外,还讨论了一致等效缺陷的问题。使用这种方法,可以省去显示出面外失稳的结构的几何非线性分析;只需要进行平面内计算和确定线性屈曲分析。最后,通过实例说明了所提方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Steel Construction-Design and Research
Steel Construction-Design and Research CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Steel Construction publishes peerreviewed papers covering the entire field of steel construction research. In the interests of "construction without depletion", it skilfully combines steel with other forms of construction employing concrete, glass, cables and membranes to form integrated steelwork systems. Since 2010 Steel Construction is the official journal for ECCS- European Convention for Constructional Steelwork members. You will find more information about membership on the ECCS homepage. Topics include: -Design and construction of structures -Methods of analysis and calculation -Experimental and theoretical research projects and results -Composite construction -Steel buildings and bridges -Cable and membrane structures -Structural glazing -Masts and towers -Vessels, cranes and hydraulic engineering structures -Fire protection -Lightweight structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信