The (UK) Freedom of Information Act’s disclosure process is broken: where do we go from here?

IF 1.8 Q1 LAW
Henry Pearce
{"title":"The (UK) Freedom of Information Act’s disclosure process is broken: where do we go from here?","authors":"Henry Pearce","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2020.1785663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article builds on previous literature in the data protection and freedom and information field, which has argued that the ‘release and forget’ disclosure model utilised by the (UK) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) is unfit for purpose in the context of personal data that have been subject to a process of anonymisation, and that reform is necessary. Rather than outlining a detailed proposal for reform, the article intends to stoke debate in this area by highlighting a range of issues and factors that could help inform discussions regarding what shape any reform of the FOIA’s disclosure model should take. The article argues that the notions of privacy and data protection by design, data licensing, risk, contextual controls, metadata, and privacy enhancing technologies, should all have a role to play in respect of improving how anonymised data are disclosed under the FOIA.","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"354 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600834.2020.1785663","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1785663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article builds on previous literature in the data protection and freedom and information field, which has argued that the ‘release and forget’ disclosure model utilised by the (UK) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) is unfit for purpose in the context of personal data that have been subject to a process of anonymisation, and that reform is necessary. Rather than outlining a detailed proposal for reform, the article intends to stoke debate in this area by highlighting a range of issues and factors that could help inform discussions regarding what shape any reform of the FOIA’s disclosure model should take. The article argues that the notions of privacy and data protection by design, data licensing, risk, contextual controls, metadata, and privacy enhancing technologies, should all have a role to play in respect of improving how anonymised data are disclosed under the FOIA.
(英国)《信息自由法》的披露程序被打破了:我们该何去何从?
摘要本文建立在数据保护、自由和信息领域的先前文献的基础上,这些文献认为,(英国)《2000年信息自由法》(FOIA)所使用的“发布和忘记”披露模式不适合用于经过匿名化过程的个人数据,因此有必要进行改革。这篇文章没有概述详细的改革建议,而是打算通过强调一系列问题和因素来引发这一领域的辩论,这些问题和因素可能有助于就《信息自由法》披露模式的任何改革应该采取何种形式进行讨论。文章认为,设计、数据许可、风险、上下文控制、元数据和隐私增强技术的隐私和数据保护概念,都应该在改善《信息自由法》下匿名数据的披露方式方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信