Scope freezing and object shift in Ukrainian: Does Superiority matter?

IF 0.7 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
S. Antonyuk, Roksolana Mykhaylyk
{"title":"Scope freezing and object shift in Ukrainian: Does Superiority matter?","authors":"S. Antonyuk, Roksolana Mykhaylyk","doi":"10.1111/synt.12229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SCOPE FREEZING AND OBJECT SHIFT IN UKRAINIAN: DOES SUPERIORITY MATTER? Svitlana Antonyuk & Roksolana Mykhaylyk This remark presents novel evidence on Ukrainian Specificity-inducing Object Shift in its interaction with Quantifier Scope, which suggests a generalization that whatever scope interpretations are established in the postverbal field will carry over into the preverbal field. We point out that the data present a serious challenge to the Superiority account of scope freezing (Bruening 2001) since it predicts that Object Shift of a QP will always freeze scope with respect to another object QP, contrary to fact. Furthermore, while Ukrainian OS does not obey Holmberg’s Generalization (Holmberg 1986), we argue that it is nevertheless fully comparable to Scandinavian OS. We propose to account for the data with a modified version of Fox and Pesetsky’s (2005) Cyclic Linearization, which accounts for the cross-linguistic differences with respect to OS as well as derives the peculiar OS QP scope interaction patterns we observe, which remain obscure on the Superiority account of scope freezing.","PeriodicalId":45823,"journal":{"name":"Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syntax-A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

SCOPE FREEZING AND OBJECT SHIFT IN UKRAINIAN: DOES SUPERIORITY MATTER? Svitlana Antonyuk & Roksolana Mykhaylyk This remark presents novel evidence on Ukrainian Specificity-inducing Object Shift in its interaction with Quantifier Scope, which suggests a generalization that whatever scope interpretations are established in the postverbal field will carry over into the preverbal field. We point out that the data present a serious challenge to the Superiority account of scope freezing (Bruening 2001) since it predicts that Object Shift of a QP will always freeze scope with respect to another object QP, contrary to fact. Furthermore, while Ukrainian OS does not obey Holmberg’s Generalization (Holmberg 1986), we argue that it is nevertheless fully comparable to Scandinavian OS. We propose to account for the data with a modified version of Fox and Pesetsky’s (2005) Cyclic Linearization, which accounts for the cross-linguistic differences with respect to OS as well as derives the peculiar OS QP scope interaction patterns we observe, which remain obscure on the Superiority account of scope freezing.
乌克兰语的范围冻结和对象转移:优势重要吗?
乌克兰的范围冻结和对象转移:优势重要吗?Svitlana Antonyuk和Roksolana Mykhaylyk这句话为乌克兰语的特定性在其与量词范围的互动中引发宾语转移提供了新的证据,这表明了一种概括,即无论在语后领域中建立什么范围解释,都会转移到语前领域。我们指出,这些数据对范围冻结的优越性描述(Bruening 2001)提出了严重的挑战,因为它预测了一个QP的对象移位将总是相对于另一个对象QP冻结范围,这与事实相反。此外,虽然乌克兰操作系统不服从Holmberg的泛化(Holmberg 1986),但我们认为它与斯堪的纳维亚操作系统完全可比。我们建议用Fox和Pesetsky(2005)的循环线性化的修改版本来解释数据,该版本解释了操作系统的跨语言差异,并导出了我们观察到的独特的操作系统QP范围交互模式,这些模式在范围冻结的优越性解释中仍然模糊不清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Syntax publishes a wide range of articles on the syntax of natural languages and closely related fields. The journal promotes work on formal syntactic theory and theoretically-oriented descriptive work on particular languages and comparative grammar. Syntax also publishes research on the interfaces between syntax and related fields such as semantics, morphology, and phonology, as well as theoretical and experimental studies in sentence processing, language acquisition, and other areas of psycholinguistics that bear on syntactic theories. In addition to full length research articles, Syntax features short articles which facilitate a fast review process. ''In the few years of its existence, Syntax quickly became one of the most prominent journals in the field, and unique as a source for high-quality studies at the forefront of research, combining theoretical inquiry and often significant innovation with outstanding descriptive and experimental work. It is indispensable for researchers in the areas it covers.'' Noam Chomsky, Massachusets Institute of Technology, USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信