{"title":"IZUZEĆE OD JURISDIKCIJE U EUROPSKOM GRAĐANSKOM PROCESNOM PRAVU","authors":"Katarina Knol Radoja","doi":"10.25234/pv/21767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the right to be exempt from jurisdiction (immunity) under customary international law and European civil procedural law following the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The aim is to research the balance between this right and the right of access to the courts as its potentially restrictive factor in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and to compare it with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. In deciding the LG and Others v. Rina and Ente Registro Navale as the most important case in this regard, the Court of Justice of the European Union states that the national court before which the issue of exemption from jurisdiction arises, must be persuaded that there will be no violation of the right of access to the courts, if it accepts the immunity objection. In this way, the Court determined the limit of exemption from jurisdiction by allowing the waiver of jurisdiction for reasons of compliance with international legal obligations and noting the need to preserve fundamental rights. However, as to the terms of that limitation, the Court remained vague.","PeriodicalId":41100,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Vjesnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/21767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper analyses the right to be exempt from jurisdiction (immunity) under customary international law and European civil procedural law following the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The aim is to research the balance between this right and the right of access to the courts as its potentially restrictive factor in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and to compare it with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. In deciding the LG and Others v. Rina and Ente Registro Navale as the most important case in this regard, the Court of Justice of the European Union states that the national court before which the issue of exemption from jurisdiction arises, must be persuaded that there will be no violation of the right of access to the courts, if it accepts the immunity objection. In this way, the Court determined the limit of exemption from jurisdiction by allowing the waiver of jurisdiction for reasons of compliance with international legal obligations and noting the need to preserve fundamental rights. However, as to the terms of that limitation, the Court remained vague.
本文根据欧洲联盟法院的解释,分析了习惯国际法和欧洲民事诉讼法规定的豁免(豁免)权。其目的是研究这项权利与在欧洲联盟法院判例法中作为其潜在限制因素的诉诸法院的权利之间的平衡,并将其与欧洲人权法院的判例法进行比较。欧洲联盟法院在决定LG及其他人诉Rina和Ente Registro Navale案为这方面最重要的案件时指出,必须说服管辖豁免问题的国家法院,如果它接受豁免反对意见,就不会侵犯诉诸法院的权利。法院以这种方式确定了豁免管辖的限度,允许出于遵守国际法律义务的理由放弃管辖权,并指出有必要维护基本权利。但是,关于这种限制的条件,法院仍然含糊其辞。