Coordination and complexity: an experiment on the effect of integration and verification in distributed design processes

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Design Science Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1017/dsj.2022.26
F. Wöhr, Ekin Uhri, S. Königs, J. Trauer, M. Stanglmeier, M. Zimmermann
{"title":"Coordination and complexity: an experiment on the effect of integration and verification in distributed design processes","authors":"F. Wöhr, Ekin Uhri, S. Königs, J. Trauer, M. Stanglmeier, M. Zimmermann","doi":"10.1017/dsj.2022.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The continuous integration and verification of components is essential in distributed design processes. Identifying the optimal integration and verification frequency, however, can be challenging due to the complexity of product development. Especially the effect of human decision-making in partially isolated development scenarios is difficult to consider. Thus, we performed an experimental study based on the following three steps: first, an extension of the existing parameter design framework, which is used to conduct experiments under laboratory conditions, in which human subjects solve quantitative surrogate design tasks. Second, a series of experiments in which 32 subjects divided into groups of two solved 229 parameter design tasks with a varying integration and verification frequency. And, third, a statistical analysis of the results with respect to development time, coupling strength and process costs. According to our results, development time can be reduced by up to 71%, if the integration and verification frequency is doubled. If process costs are also considered, the optimal frequency can be subject to a conflict of goals between reducing development time and minimising process cost.","PeriodicalId":54146,"journal":{"name":"Design Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The continuous integration and verification of components is essential in distributed design processes. Identifying the optimal integration and verification frequency, however, can be challenging due to the complexity of product development. Especially the effect of human decision-making in partially isolated development scenarios is difficult to consider. Thus, we performed an experimental study based on the following three steps: first, an extension of the existing parameter design framework, which is used to conduct experiments under laboratory conditions, in which human subjects solve quantitative surrogate design tasks. Second, a series of experiments in which 32 subjects divided into groups of two solved 229 parameter design tasks with a varying integration and verification frequency. And, third, a statistical analysis of the results with respect to development time, coupling strength and process costs. According to our results, development time can be reduced by up to 71%, if the integration and verification frequency is doubled. If process costs are also considered, the optimal frequency can be subject to a conflict of goals between reducing development time and minimising process cost.
协调与复杂性:分布式设计过程中集成与验证效果的实验
摘要组件的持续集成和验证在分布式设计过程中至关重要。然而,由于产品开发的复杂性,确定最佳集成和验证频率可能具有挑战性。特别是在部分孤立的开发场景中,人类决策的影响很难考虑。因此,我们基于以下三个步骤进行了一项实验研究:首先,对现有参数设计框架的扩展,该框架用于在实验室条件下进行实验,其中人类受试者解决定量代理设计任务。其次,一系列实验中,32名受试者分成两组,解决了229项具有不同积分和验证频率的参数设计任务。第三,对开发时间、耦合强度和工艺成本的结果进行统计分析。根据我们的结果,如果集成和验证频率增加一倍,开发时间可以减少71%。如果还考虑工艺成本,则最佳频率可能会在减少开发时间和最小化工艺成本之间产生目标冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Design Science
Design Science ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信