Patient bill of rights knowledge and perceived practice among females visiting a patient safety event at King Saud University

Q3 Health Professions
R. Dabbagh, N. Alyousefi, Nora A Alrowais, S. Alduraywish, M. Saja, L. Alwatban, Shahad Al-Qahtani, Areej Al-Nomi
{"title":"Patient bill of rights knowledge and perceived practice among females visiting a patient safety event at King Saud University","authors":"R. Dabbagh, N. Alyousefi, Nora A Alrowais, S. Alduraywish, M. Saja, L. Alwatban, Shahad Al-Qahtani, Areej Al-Nomi","doi":"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_141_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge about the patient bill of rights (PBR) among visitors of the King Saud University (KSU) “Patient Safety Day” event and the associated demographic features, to measure the level at which these PBR items were observed among the visitors during their medical care experiences, and to assess the perception of the importance of the PBR items from the participants' perspectives. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey among visitors of the KSU “Patient Safety Day” event was conducted, using interview-based questionnaires. The questionnaire was adapted from the items assessed in previous studies exploring knowledge of PBR. All analyses were conducted using a statistical analysis system. Results: Around 198 individuals participated in the surveys (response = 95.2%) and the majority of them were students. Only 28.6% of them reported being aware of the PBR mainly from hospital posters (27.3%) and by a treating physician (1.8%). Results of the survey did not yield significant associations between the knowledge of PBR and each of the levels of completed education and participant status. The faculty and staff had greater odds of knowing about PBR compared to the students (odds ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval = 0.60, 6.00). Conclusion: The study showed that only about a quarter of the participants reported being aware of the PBR. This necessitates increasing the efforts of health-care facilities to educate their patients about PBR. Hospital posters may be the best way to introduce these PBR to patients. However, this does not replace the need for direct communication about PBR by treating health-care teams.","PeriodicalId":33866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"247 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_141_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge about the patient bill of rights (PBR) among visitors of the King Saud University (KSU) “Patient Safety Day” event and the associated demographic features, to measure the level at which these PBR items were observed among the visitors during their medical care experiences, and to assess the perception of the importance of the PBR items from the participants' perspectives. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey among visitors of the KSU “Patient Safety Day” event was conducted, using interview-based questionnaires. The questionnaire was adapted from the items assessed in previous studies exploring knowledge of PBR. All analyses were conducted using a statistical analysis system. Results: Around 198 individuals participated in the surveys (response = 95.2%) and the majority of them were students. Only 28.6% of them reported being aware of the PBR mainly from hospital posters (27.3%) and by a treating physician (1.8%). Results of the survey did not yield significant associations between the knowledge of PBR and each of the levels of completed education and participant status. The faculty and staff had greater odds of knowing about PBR compared to the students (odds ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval = 0.60, 6.00). Conclusion: The study showed that only about a quarter of the participants reported being aware of the PBR. This necessitates increasing the efforts of health-care facilities to educate their patients about PBR. Hospital posters may be the best way to introduce these PBR to patients. However, this does not replace the need for direct communication about PBR by treating health-care teams.
在沙特国王大学参加患者安全活动的女性中,患者权利法案知识和感知实践
目的:本研究旨在评估沙特国王大学(KSU)“患者安全日”活动访客对患者权利法案(PBR)的了解水平及其相关的人口统计特征,以衡量访客在医疗体验中观察到这些PBR项目的水平,以及从参与者的角度评估PBR项目的重要性。材料和方法:使用基于访谈的问卷调查,对KSU“患者安全日”活动的访客进行了横断面调查。该问卷改编自先前探索PBR知识的研究中评估的项目。所有分析均使用统计分析系统进行。结果:约有198人参加了调查(回答率为95.2%),其中大多数是学生。只有28.6%的受访者表示,他们主要从医院海报(27.3%)和主治医生(1.8%)那里了解PBR。调查结果表明,PBR知识与每一个完成教育水平和参与者状态之间没有显著关联。与学生相比,教职员工了解PBR的几率更大(比值比=1.93,95%置信区间=0.60,6.00)。结论:研究表明,只有大约四分之一的参与者表示知道PBR。这就需要医疗机构加大力度,对患者进行PBR教育。医院海报可能是向患者介绍这些PBR的最佳方式。然而,这并不能取代通过治疗医疗团队直接沟通PBR的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信