Bicycle use in Latin American cities: changes over time by socio-economic position

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
I. Avila-Palencia, O. Sarmiento, N. Gouveia, Alejandra Jáuregui, M. Mascolli, A. Slovic, Daniel A. Rodríguez
{"title":"Bicycle use in Latin American cities: changes over time by socio-economic position","authors":"I. Avila-Palencia, O. Sarmiento, N. Gouveia, Alejandra Jáuregui, M. Mascolli, A. Slovic, Daniel A. Rodríguez","doi":"10.3389/frsc.2023.1055351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction We aimed to examine utilitarian bicycle use among adults from 18 large Latin American cities and its association with socio-economic position (education and income) between 2008 and 2018. Methods Data came from yearly cross-sectional surveys collected by the Development Bank of Latin America (CAF). A total of 77,765 survey respondents with complete data were used to estimate multilevel logistic regression models with city as random intercept and year as random slope. Results Individuals with high education and high-income levels had lower odds of using a bicycle compared with participants with lower education and income levels. These associations, however, changed over time with the odds of bicycle use increasing for all groups, especially among individuals with the highest education and income levels. Discussion Our results confirm the broadening appeal of bicycling across socio-economic positions in several Latin American cities and reinforce the importance of considering policies aimed at supporting and enhancing bicycle travel for all users.","PeriodicalId":33686,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1055351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction We aimed to examine utilitarian bicycle use among adults from 18 large Latin American cities and its association with socio-economic position (education and income) between 2008 and 2018. Methods Data came from yearly cross-sectional surveys collected by the Development Bank of Latin America (CAF). A total of 77,765 survey respondents with complete data were used to estimate multilevel logistic regression models with city as random intercept and year as random slope. Results Individuals with high education and high-income levels had lower odds of using a bicycle compared with participants with lower education and income levels. These associations, however, changed over time with the odds of bicycle use increasing for all groups, especially among individuals with the highest education and income levels. Discussion Our results confirm the broadening appeal of bicycling across socio-economic positions in several Latin American cities and reinforce the importance of considering policies aimed at supporting and enhancing bicycle travel for all users.
拉丁美洲城市的自行车使用情况:随着时间的推移随着社会经济地位的变化
引言我们旨在研究2008年至2018年间,拉丁美洲18个大城市成年人的实用自行车使用情况及其与社会经济地位(教育和收入)的关系。方法数据来自拉丁美洲开发银行(CAF)收集的年度横断面调查。共有77765名数据完整的调查对象被用于估计以城市为随机截距、年份为随机斜率的多层次逻辑回归模型。结果与教育程度和收入水平较低的参与者相比,教育程度和高收入水平较高的人使用自行车的几率较低。然而,随着时间的推移,这些联系发生了变化,所有群体使用自行车的几率都在增加,尤其是在受教育程度和收入水平最高的人群中。讨论我们的研究结果证实了骑自行车在几个拉丁美洲城市的社会经济地位中的吸引力不断扩大,并强调了考虑旨在支持和加强所有用户自行车出行的政策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信