Pindar, Song, and Space: Towards a Lyric Archaeology, by Richard Neer and Leslie Kurke

IF 0.4 1区 艺术学 0 ART
M. Pavlou
{"title":"Pindar, Song, and Space: Towards a Lyric Archaeology, by Richard Neer and Leslie Kurke","authors":"M. Pavlou","doi":"10.1080/00043079.2021.1917277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experience of the COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented one, with severe repercussions in each and every aspect of our lives, not least within academia. One of the things that has struck me during this period is the astonishing, generous outpouring of assistance and collaboration among classicists via the ClassicistsList forum, which has allowed the exchange of books and articles at a time when there has been limited or no access to libraries and other such resources.1 Even though solidarity and constructive dialogue are a given among classicists, paradoxically, this kind of collaboration seldom materializes in the form of coauthored books and articles. Whereas collaboration in research writing is a well-established practice in other disciplines, in classics (not to mention in the humanities as a whole), soleauthored books and articles continue to prevail, and research remains a mostly solitary pursuit. In light of this, the recently published book by Richard Neer, professor of art history, cinema, and media studies at the College at the University of Chicago, and Leslie Kurke, professor of classics and comparative literature at the University of California, Berkeley, is both a welcome addition and a meritorious initiative. Although it would be a serious omission not to acknowledge the long history of interdisciplinary approaches within classics, interdisciplinary collaborations are de facto more likely to pave wider intellectual pathways and break new ground. The book, entitled Pindar, Song, and Space: Towards a Lyric Archaeology, comprises an introduction; three parts subdivided into a total of eight chapters; a succinct coda; an appendix; an index locorum; and a general index. Prima facie, the title gives the impression that this is a book about Pindar, or more precisely, a book that seeks either to explore how Pindar thematizes and integrates the built environment into his song or to identify the multifarious ways in which the Theban poet uses the language and imagery of material culture to define and aggrandize his poetry. Yet, while Pindar is featured prominently throughout the book and serves as its unifying thread, the book is not, in fact, primarily about him. As Neer and Kurke clarify from the outset, the scope of the book is much broader and more ambitious: to study “the concept and experience of space in Classical Greece” (1) by mapping “the dialectical interaction of song, artifacts, and spatiality” (3). In expounding the rationale of their interdisciplinary approach in the short but informative introduction, the authors make clear that their aim is not merely to set art history, philology, and archaeology side by side but rather to suggest a radically new way of approaching and com-","PeriodicalId":46667,"journal":{"name":"ART BULLETIN","volume":"103 1","pages":"149 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ART BULLETIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2021.1917277","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The experience of the COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented one, with severe repercussions in each and every aspect of our lives, not least within academia. One of the things that has struck me during this period is the astonishing, generous outpouring of assistance and collaboration among classicists via the ClassicistsList forum, which has allowed the exchange of books and articles at a time when there has been limited or no access to libraries and other such resources.1 Even though solidarity and constructive dialogue are a given among classicists, paradoxically, this kind of collaboration seldom materializes in the form of coauthored books and articles. Whereas collaboration in research writing is a well-established practice in other disciplines, in classics (not to mention in the humanities as a whole), soleauthored books and articles continue to prevail, and research remains a mostly solitary pursuit. In light of this, the recently published book by Richard Neer, professor of art history, cinema, and media studies at the College at the University of Chicago, and Leslie Kurke, professor of classics and comparative literature at the University of California, Berkeley, is both a welcome addition and a meritorious initiative. Although it would be a serious omission not to acknowledge the long history of interdisciplinary approaches within classics, interdisciplinary collaborations are de facto more likely to pave wider intellectual pathways and break new ground. The book, entitled Pindar, Song, and Space: Towards a Lyric Archaeology, comprises an introduction; three parts subdivided into a total of eight chapters; a succinct coda; an appendix; an index locorum; and a general index. Prima facie, the title gives the impression that this is a book about Pindar, or more precisely, a book that seeks either to explore how Pindar thematizes and integrates the built environment into his song or to identify the multifarious ways in which the Theban poet uses the language and imagery of material culture to define and aggrandize his poetry. Yet, while Pindar is featured prominently throughout the book and serves as its unifying thread, the book is not, in fact, primarily about him. As Neer and Kurke clarify from the outset, the scope of the book is much broader and more ambitious: to study “the concept and experience of space in Classical Greece” (1) by mapping “the dialectical interaction of song, artifacts, and spatiality” (3). In expounding the rationale of their interdisciplinary approach in the short but informative introduction, the authors make clear that their aim is not merely to set art history, philology, and archaeology side by side but rather to suggest a radically new way of approaching and com-
品达、歌曲和空间:走向抒情考古,作者:理查德·尼尔和莱斯利·库尔克
2019冠状病毒病大流行的经历是前所未有的,严重影响了我们生活的方方面面,尤其是学术界。在这段时间里,令我印象深刻的一件事是,古典学者们通过ClassicistsList论坛提供了惊人的、慷慨的帮助和合作,在人们无法进入图书馆和其他类似资源的情况下,这个论坛允许人们交换书籍和文章尽管古典主义者之间的团结和建设性对话是给定的,但矛盾的是,这种合作很少以合著书籍和文章的形式实现。然而,在其他学科中,在经典著作中(更不用说在整个人文学科中),研究写作中的合作是一种公认的做法,独自撰写的书籍和文章继续盛行,研究仍然是一种孤独的追求。有鉴于此,芝加哥大学学院艺术史、电影和媒体研究教授理查德·尼尔(Richard Neer)和加州大学伯克利分校古典文学和比较文学教授莱斯利·库尔克(Leslie Kurke)最近出版的新书既是一个受欢迎的补充,也是一个值得称道的创举。尽管不承认经典中跨学科方法的悠久历史将是一个严重的疏忽,但跨学科合作实际上更有可能铺平更广阔的知识途径并开辟新的领域。这本名为《品达、歌曲和空间:走向抒情考古学》的书包括引言;三部分共分为八章;结尾:简洁的结尾;附录;索引地点;还有一个一般的指标。乍一看,书名给人的印象是这是一本关于品达的书,或者更准确地说,这本书要么试图探索品达如何将建筑环境主题化并融入他的歌曲中,要么试图识别底比斯诗人使用物质文化的语言和意象来定义和强化他的诗歌的各种方式。然而,尽管品达在整本书中占据突出地位,并成为全书的统一线索,但事实上,这本书主要不是关于他的。正如尼尔和库尔克从一开始就阐明的那样,这本书的范围要广泛得多,也更有野心:通过绘制“歌曲、文物和空间性的辩证相互作用”(3)来研究“古典希腊的空间概念和经验”(1)。在简短但内容丰富的介绍中,作者阐述了他们跨学科方法的基本原理,明确表示他们的目标不仅仅是将艺术史、文献学和考古学放在一起,而是提出一种全新的接近和交流的方式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
28.60%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Art Bulletin publishes leading scholarship in the English language in all aspects of art history as practiced in the academy, museums, and other institutions. From its founding in 1913, the journal has published, through rigorous peer review, scholarly articles and critical reviews of the highest quality in all areas and periods of the history of art. Articles take a variety of methodological approaches, from the historical to the theoretical. In its mission as a journal of record, The Art Bulletin fosters an intensive engagement with intellectual developments and debates in contemporary art-historical practice. It is published four times a year in March, June, September, and December
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信